dc.contributor.author | Mahon-Haft, Taj Alexander | de |
dc.contributor.author | Dillman, Don A. | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-08-13T10:47:33Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-08-13T10:47:33Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1864-3361 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44196 | |
dc.description.abstract | "Due to recent scholarly attention to visual design, much is known about the effects that specific design features have on web surveys, but little attention has been paid to the effects of overall screen design. Applying Norman's (2004) emotional design concepts to web survey design, the authors propose and test hypotheses related to potential detrimental impacts of poor screen aesthetics. To do so, they compare data collected from two versions of the same Student Experience Survey, an experimental design representing poor aesthetics and a control design representing good emotional design. By triggering negative visceral responses and, thus, emotional reactions, the experimental design is predicted to reduce data quality along four avenues: respondent cooperation, substantive response patterns, respondent commitment, and subjective survey experience. Sixteen of 30 total comparisons show reduced data quality on the experimental forms, and all avenues to quality data show some impact. These findings suggest that screen design aesthetics and emotional reactions can impact data quality, independent of survey content. However, the inconsistent results according to some indicators suggest the need for further research on screen design effects to hone our understanding." (author's abstract) | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Publizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | News media, journalism, publishing | en |
dc.title | Does visual appeal matter? Effects of web survey aesthetics on survey quality | de |
dc.title.alternative | Ist visuelle Gestaltung von Bedeutung? Auswirkungen der Web-Survey-Ästhetik auf die Umfragequalität | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Survey Research Methods | |
dc.source.volume | 4 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Research Design | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.classoz | interaktive, elektronische Medien | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Interactive, electronic Media | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Internet | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Internet | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Website | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | website | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Gestaltung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | layout | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Qualität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | quality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Design | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | design | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | visuelle Wahrnehmung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | visual perception | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Auswirkung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | impact | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Hypothesenprüfung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | hypothesis testing | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datenqualität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data quality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Motivation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | motivation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Ästhetik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | aesthetics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Methodologie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | methodology | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | USA | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | United States of America | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Nordamerika | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | North America | en |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040528 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10064822 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036238 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037327 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040773 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10053789 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037482 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046973 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055811 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037910 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036462 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034653 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036452 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043388 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041244 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035407 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 43-59 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10104 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 1080404 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 674 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 070 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2010.v4i1.2264 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 3 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.description.misc | gesis-solis-00547870 | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | false | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |