Bibtex export

 

@article{ Tijdens2015,
 title = {Self-identification of occupation in web surveys: requirements for search trees and look-up tables},
 author = {Tijdens, Kea},
 journal = {Survey Methods: Insights from the Field},
 pages = {11},
 year = {2015},
 issn = {2296-4754},
 doi = {https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2015-00008},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-440543},
 abstract = {Can self-identification of occupation be applied in web surveys by using a look-up table with
coded occupational titles, in contrast to other survey modes where an open format question with
office-coding has to be applied? This article is among the first to explore this approach, using a
random sampled web survey (N=3,224) with a  three-level search tree with 1,603 occupations and
offering a text box at the bottom of each 3rd level list. 67% of respondents ticked in total 585
occupations, of which 349 by at least two respondents and 236 by only one, pointing to a long
tail in the distribution. The text box was used by 32% of respondents, adding 207 occupational titles. Multivariate analysis shows that text box use was related to poor search paths and absent
occupations. Search paths for five of the 23 first-level entries should be improved and the look-up table should be extended to 3,000 occupations. In this way, text box use and, thus, expensive manual coding could be reduced substantially. For such large look-up tables semantic matching tools are preferred over search trees to ease respondent’s self-identification and thus self-coding. (author's abstract)},
 keywords = {quantitative Methode; quantitative method; Fragebogen; questionnaire; Entwicklung; development; Antwortverhalten; response behavior; Testkonstruktion; test construction; Datengewinnung; data capture; Messinstrument; measurement instrument; Berufssituation; occupational situation; Klassifikation; classification; Online-Befragung; online survey; Methodenforschung; methodological research}}