dc.contributor.author | Tijdens, Kea | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2015-07-31T09:36:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2015-07-31T09:36:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2015 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2296-4754 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/44054 | |
dc.description.abstract | Can self-identification of occupation be applied in web surveys by using a look-up table with
coded occupational titles, in contrast to other survey modes where an open format question with
office-coding has to be applied? This article is among the first to explore this approach, using a
random sampled web survey (N=3,224) with a three-level search tree with 1,603 occupations and
offering a text box at the bottom of each 3rd level list. 67% of respondents ticked in total 585
occupations, of which 349 by at least two respondents and 236 by only one, pointing to a long
tail in the distribution. The text box was used by 32% of respondents, adding 207 occupational titles. Multivariate analysis shows that text box use was related to poor search paths and absent
occupations. Search paths for five of the 23 first-level entries should be improved and the look-up table should be extended to 3,000 occupations. In this way, text box use and, thus, expensive manual coding could be reduced substantially. For such large look-up tables semantic matching tools are preferred over search trees to ease respondent’s self-identification and thus self-coding. (author's abstract) | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | look-up table; search tree | de |
dc.title | Self-identification of occupation in web surveys: requirements for search trees and look-up tables | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Survey Methods: Insights from the Field | |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | quantitative Methode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | quantitative method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Fragebogen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | questionnaire | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Entwicklung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | development | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Antwortverhalten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | response behavior | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Testkonstruktion | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | test construction | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datengewinnung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data capture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Messinstrument | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | measurement instrument | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Berufssituation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | occupational situation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Klassifikation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | classification | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Online-Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | online survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Methodenforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | methodological research | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-440543 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052183 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037914 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036415 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035808 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060178 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040547 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10041769 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038328 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048972 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037911 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10052193 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 11 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 472 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2015-00008 | de |
dc.subject.methods | empirisch | de |
dc.subject.methods | empirical | en |
dc.subject.methods | empirisch-quantitativ | de |
dc.subject.methods | quantitative empirical | en |
dc.subject.methods | Methodenentwicklung | de |
dc.subject.methods | development of methods | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 2 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 4 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 6 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 11 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 20100 | de |
dc.subject.classhort | 10200 | de |
internal.pdf.version | 1.4 | |
internal.pdf.valid | true | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |