Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPasteels, Ingede
dc.date.accessioned2015-04-20T15:50:02Z
dc.date.available2015-04-20T15:50:02Z
dc.date.issued2015de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/42715
dc.description.abstractThis paper deals with adjustment for nonresponse in dyadic multi-actor survey designs. It presents a multi-dimensional approach to weighting that addresses the various analytical units represented in such data, so that sampling design weights are correctly accounted for and so that consistency between weights is achieved. This approach is demonstrated by using the primary respondents in the Divorce in Flanders study, which is a typical example of a dyadic multi-actor design. Five sets of weighting coefficients are made available whereby different subsets of data, according to different analytical units, are selected: the subset of the dyads, the subset of men and women respectively, and two subsets of marriages. Post-stratification – with the year of marriage, status of the reference marriage at the sampling date and five-year divorce cohort as auxiliary variables – was chosen as the weighting adjustment technique.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleHow to weight survey data with a dyadic multi-actor design?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozrandom sampleen
dc.subject.thesozsampleen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Schichtungde
dc.subject.thesozweightingen
dc.subject.thesozAnalyseverfahrende
dc.subject.thesozZufallsauswahlde
dc.subject.thesozanalysis procedureen
dc.subject.thesozsocial stratificationen
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozStichprobede
dc.subject.thesozGewichtungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-427150
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Worksen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035525
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037472
internal.identifier.thesoz10045727
internal.identifier.thesoz10063008
internal.identifier.thesoz10041896
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo1-11de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicWeighting: Practical Issues and ‘How to’ Approach
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence2
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.3
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record