Show simple item record

[working paper]

dc.contributor.authorGiesselmann, Marcode
dc.contributor.authorHilmer, Richardde
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Nico A.de
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Gert G.de
dc.date.accessioned2013-11-06T11:57:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2015-03-13T07:34:33Z
dc.date.available2015-03-13T07:34:33Z
dc.date.issued2013de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/42296
dc.description.abstract"Numerous people in Germany, including politicians and researchers, believe that the gross domestic product (GDP) is an outdated indicator of a society’s prosperity. Therefore, at the end of 2010, the German Bundestag, the federal parliament, established a study commission (Enquete-Kommission) tasked with developing an alternative to the GDP for measuring growth, prosperity, and quality of life. This commission has now submitted a proposal: to supplement the GDP with nine additional indicators, including a wide range of factors such as the distribution of income, biodiversity, and life expectancy. The ten indicators cover three dimensions of well-being-economy, ecology, and social wealth-and hence are called W3 Indicators. Replacing the gross domestic product by a single alternative index was rejected by the commission, however, since it is not possible to reduce citizens' very different wishes and expectations to "a common denominator". A representative survey of registered voters conducted by DIW Berlin and TNS Infratest shows that citizens consider the indicators proposed by the commission to be important. Respondents ranked preserving "democracy and freedom" as the most relevant indicator and "further increasing life expectancy" as the least relevant. The average per capita income -as an indicator of the gross domestic product- is the second least relevant factor as far as registered voters in Germany are concerned. However, the study also shows that opinions on the importance of different indicators vary widely. Moreover, there are systematic differences in the relevance of various policy areas for different social groups." (author's abstract)en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.titleMeasuring well-being: W3 indicators to complement GDPde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume217de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityBerlinde
dc.source.seriesRatSWD Working Paper Series
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.classozWirtschaftssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozSociology of Economicsen
dc.subject.thesozWohlbefindende
dc.subject.thesozwell-beingen
dc.subject.thesozBruttoinlandsproduktde
dc.subject.thesozgross domestic producten
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozWachstumde
dc.subject.thesozgrowthen
dc.subject.thesozWohlstandde
dc.subject.thesozprosperityen
dc.subject.thesozLebensqualitätde
dc.subject.thesozquality of lifeen
dc.subject.thesozIndikatorde
dc.subject.thesozindicatoren
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozSOEPde
dc.subject.thesozSOEPen
dc.subject.thesozGesellschaftde
dc.subject.thesozsocietyen
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftde
dc.subject.thesozeconomyen
dc.subject.thesozÖkologiede
dc.subject.thesozecologyen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozFreiheitde
dc.subject.thesozfreedomen
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.date.modified2014-01-20T08:18:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceDeposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modificationsen
ssoar.contributor.institutionUSB Kölnde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10045580
internal.identifier.thesoz10039807
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
internal.identifier.thesoz10039142
internal.identifier.thesoz10062622
internal.identifier.thesoz10050696
internal.identifier.thesoz10047129
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10050424
internal.identifier.thesoz10034805
internal.identifier.thesoz10053629
internal.identifier.thesoz10053606
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10038509
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo18de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.classoz10205
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorRat für Sozial- und Wirtschaftsdaten (RatSWD)
internal.identifier.corporateeditor604
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence3
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.description.misctruede
internal.identifier.series876
dc.subject.classhort10100de
dc.subject.classhort10200de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedfalse
dc.identifier.handlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10419/75329
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record