Endnote export

 

%T Determining the determined state: a sizing of size from aside/ the amassing of mass by a mass
%A Kirsh, Marvin E.
%J Philosophical Papers and Reviews
%N 4
%P 49-65
%V 4
%D 2013
%K social and natural evolution; mind and matter; shape and form; Michel Foucault; common cause; theory of relativity; 'the concept'; the transcendental object; legal arbitration; equality
%@ 2141-663X
%~ California State University Los Angeles USA
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-408932
%X A philosophical exploration is presented that considers entities such as atoms, electrons, protons, reasoned (in existing physics theories) by induction, to be other than universal building blocks, but artifacts of a sociological struggle that in elemental description is identical with that of all processes of matter and energy. In a universal context both men and materials, when stressed, struggle to accomplish/maintain the free state. The space occupied by cognition, inferred to be the result of the inequality of spaces, is an integral component of both processes and process interpretation; arbitration space, ubiquitous throughout nature, occurred to a vast number of vastnesses, a manifestation of the existence of time dependent mass/number/amount, is argued to be located to the same judging criteria with which principles are determined for sociological purposes: the processes of mind are determined (excuse the pun) to occur as a free state that is reflectively equal to what is construed by the intellect as universe. Scientifically determined states are not free states.
%C MISC
%G en
%9 journal article
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info