dc.contributor.author | Schouten, Barry | de |
dc.contributor.author | Laan, Jan van der | de |
dc.contributor.author | Cobben, Fannie | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2014-12-01T13:13:31Z | |
dc.date.available | 2014-12-01T13:13:31Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2014 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 2296-4754 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/40747 | |
dc.description.abstract | In 2011, a large-scale mixed-mode experiment was linked to the Crime Victimisation Survey (CVS). This experiment consisted of a randomized allocation of sample persons to the four contemporary survey modes Web, mail, telephone and face-to-face, and a follow-up using only interviewer modes. The aim of the experiment was to disentangle mode-specific selection- and measurement bias. In a previous paper (Schouten et al 2013), mode-specific selection and measurement biases were reported for a large number of key variables from the CVS and the Labour Force Survey. This paper is a follow-up to that study and investigates the size of the selection and measurement biases as a function of contact effort, where contact effort refers to the number of telephone calls, the number of face-to-face visits and the number of reminders in Web and mail. In the analyses, face-to-face response based on a maximum of six visits, the default face-to-face strategy at Statistics Netherlands, is used as the benchmark.
The analyses show that contact effort has little impact on the size of measurement bias and a modest impact on the size of selection bias. From the results, it is therefore concluded that contact effort is not a strong common cause of nonresponse and measurement error. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.title | The impact of contact effort on mode-specific selection and measurement bias | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Survey Methods: Insights from the Field | |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Antwortverhalten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | response behavior | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Erhebungsmethode | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data collection method | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datengewinnung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data capture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Fehler | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | error | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Interview | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | interview | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Stichprobenfehler | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | sampling error | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Stichprobe | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | sample | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Messung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | measurement | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Trend | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | trend | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Experiment | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | experiment | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | CATI | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | computer-assisted telephone interview | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Kontakt | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | contact | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-407472 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035808 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037910 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037921 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040547 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043384 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037913 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10059347 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037472 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036930 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042413 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10043015 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060120 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049667 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 8 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 472 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2014-00004 | |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 2 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.version | 1.3 | |
internal.pdf.valid | true | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |