Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSelart, Marcusde
dc.contributor.authorMontgomery, Henryde
dc.contributor.authorRomanus, Joakimde
dc.contributor.authorGärling, Tommyde
dc.date.accessioned2014-10-10T08:26:32Z
dc.date.available2014-10-10T08:26:32Z
dc.date.issued1994de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/40151
dc.description.abstractA violation of procedure invariance in preference measurement is that the predominant or prominent attribute looms larger in choice than in a matching task. In Experiment 1, this so-called prominence effect was demonstrated for choices between pairs of options, choices to accept single options, and preference ratings of single options. That is, in all these response modes the prominent attribute loomed larger than in matching. The results were replicated in Experiment 2, in which subjects chose between or rated their preference for pairs of options which were matched to be equally attractive either in the same session or 1 week earlier. On the basis of these and previous results, it is argued that the prominence effect is a reliable phenomenon. However, none of several cognitive explanations which have been offered appears to be completely viable.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.titleViolations of procedure invariance in preference measurement: Cognitive explanationsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Cognitive Psychology
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue4de
dc.subject.classozAllgemeine Psychologiede
dc.subject.classozGeneral Psychologyen
dc.subject.thesozPräferenzde
dc.subject.thesozpreferenceen
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozkognitive Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozcognitive factorsen
dc.subject.thesozEntscheidungsfindungde
dc.subject.thesozdecision makingen
dc.subject.thesozPräferenzordnungde
dc.subject.thesozpreference orderingen
dc.subject.thesozUrteilsbildungde
dc.subject.thesozjudgment formationen
dc.subject.thesozEntscheidungsprozessde
dc.subject.thesozdecision making processen
dc.subject.thesozRational-Choice-Theoriede
dc.subject.thesozrational choice theoryen
dc.subject.thesozexperimentelle Psychologiede
dc.subject.thesozexperimental psychologyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-401518
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungende
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlikeen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10054152
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
internal.identifier.thesoz10049141
internal.identifier.thesoz10042187
internal.identifier.thesoz10055065
internal.identifier.thesoz10041759
internal.identifier.thesoz10042188
internal.identifier.thesoz10058606
internal.identifier.thesoz10043018
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo417-436de
internal.identifier.classoz10703
internal.identifier.journal640
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence8
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.version1.4
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.ocrnull Page_1 Page_2 Page_3 Page_4 Page_5 Page_6 Page_7 Page_8 Page_9 Page_10 Page_11 Page_12 Page_13 Page_14 Page_15 Page_16 Page_17 Page_18 Page_19 Page_20
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record