Bibtex export

 

@article{ Gunnarsson2007,
 title = {Other sides of the coin: a feminist perspective on robustness in science and knowledge production},
 author = {Gunnarsson, Ewa},
 journal = {International Journal of Action Research},
 number = {3},
 pages = {349-363},
 volume = {3},
 year = {2007},
 issn = {1861-1303},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-356423},
 abstract = {"Driving forces behind the occurrence of either paradigm shifts in science,
or the development of new orientations within science, are often linked to
demands for an increased validity or reliability in knowledge production
in science. With this as a starting point, I discuss parallels and diversities
between gender and feminist research and interactive research orientations
1. Both traditions have a joint democratic ambition, as well as an aim
to increase reliability of science. Reliability will be discussed as “social
robustness” (Novotny et al. 2001). Focus will be on contributions from
gender and feminist research that can lead to a joint qualifying process for
both research traditions. Starting from a general discussion using “reflexive
gender reminders”, to frame knowledge production, I then discuss dilemmas
of robustness in interactive research processes, and researcher and
participant subjectivity." (author's abstract)},
 keywords = {Validität; gender studies; Wissensproduktion; Frauenforschung; knowledge production; women's studies; research approach; Forschungsansatz; Geschlechterforschung; Feminismus; validity; Reliabilität; feminism; reliability}}