Endnote export

 

%T Trade agreements with side-effects? European Union and United States to negotiate Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership
%A Mildner, Stormy-Annika
%A Schmucker, Claudia
%P 8
%V 18/2013
%D 2013
%K Marktzugang; Zölle; Nichttarifäre Handelshemmnisse; Auswirkung internationalen Abkommens; Internationale Handelsordnung; WTO-Welthandelsrunde 01. (Doha, 2001-11-09); Dienstleistungen; Handelsumlenkung; Streitbeilegungsverfahren (WTO)
%@ 1861-1761
%~ SWP
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-346607
%X "At the G8 summit in Northern Ireland on June 17, the European Union and the United States kicked off the negotiations for a comprehensive Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) to reduce tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers. While the expected economic benefits for both sides would be more than welcome in an era of gloomy growth forecasts, a TTIP is not entirely without risks for global trade and the multilateral trading system. The talks could tie up a considerable portion of EU and US negotiating capacity and divert attention from the WTO Doha Round. More broadly, potential trade-diverting effects could function to the detriment of other trading partners. Such side-effects should be avoided. The 'high road' of international trade policy must remain the WTO, with bilateral agreements making sense only as a stepping stone to multilateral liberalisation. Alongside the TTIP talks, the Transatlantic Partners should therefore continue to push for a conclusion of the Doha Round. And the TTIP must be designed to be compatible with WTO rules." (author's abstract)
%C DEU
%C Berlin
%G en
%9 comment
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info