Bibtex export

 

@book{ Mildner2013,
 title = {Trade agreements with side-effects? European Union and United States to negotiate Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership},
 author = {Mildner, Stormy-Annika and Schmucker, Claudia},
 year = {2013},
 series = {SWP Comment},
 pages = {8},
 volume = {18/2013},
 address = {Berlin},
 publisher = {Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik -SWP- Deutsches Institut für Internationale Politik und Sicherheit},
 issn = {1861-1761},
 urn = {https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-346607},
 abstract = {"At the G8 summit in Northern Ireland on June 17, the European Union and the United States kicked off the negotiations for a comprehensive Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) to reduce tariffs and non-tariff trade barriers. While the expected economic benefits for both sides would be more than welcome in an era of gloomy growth forecasts, a TTIP is not entirely without risks for global trade and the multilateral trading system. The talks could tie up a considerable portion of EU and US negotiating capacity and divert attention from the WTO Doha Round. More broadly, potential trade-diverting effects could function to the detriment of other trading partners. Such side-effects should be avoided. The 'high road' of international trade policy must remain the WTO, with bilateral agreements making sense only as a stepping stone to multilateral liberalisation. Alongside the TTIP talks, the Transatlantic Partners should therefore continue to push for a conclusion of the Doha Round. And the TTIP must be designed to be compatible with WTO rules." (author's abstract)},
 keywords = {EU; Handelshemmnis; bilateral relations; liberalization; Wirtschaftsbeziehungen; Transaktionskosten; bilaterale Beziehungen; Handel; trade barrier; WTO; USA; transaction costs; internationales Abkommen; international agreement; direct investment; commerce; Liberalisierung; WTO; Direktinvestition; economic relations; trade policy; Handelspolitik; United States of America; EU}}