Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCouper, Mick P.de
dc.date.accessioned2013-06-05T12:09:03Z
dc.date.available2013-06-05T12:09:03Z
dc.date.issued2013de
dc.identifier.issn2296-4754
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/34214
dc.description.abstractWe explore the effect of offering an open-ended comment field in a Web survey to reduce the threat of sensitive questions. Two experiments were field in a probability-based Web panel in the Netherlands. For a set of 10 items on attitudes to immigrants, a random half were offered the opportunity to explain or clarify their responses, with the hypothesis being that doing so would reduce the need to choose socially desirable answers, resulting in higher levels of prejudice. Across two experiments, we find significant effects contrary to our hypothesis – the opportunity to comment decreased the level of prejudice reported, and longer comments were associated with more tolerant attitudes among those who were offered the comment field.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.titleResearch Note: Reducing the Threat of Sensitive Questions in Online Surveys?de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSurvey Methods: Insights from the Field
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozUmfrageforschungde
dc.subject.thesozsurvey researchen
dc.subject.thesozAntwortverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozresponse behavioren
dc.subject.thesozOnline-Befragungde
dc.subject.thesozonline surveyen
dc.subject.thesozFragebogende
dc.subject.thesozquestionnaireen
dc.subject.thesozNiederlandede
dc.subject.thesozNetherlandsen
dc.subject.thesozPanelde
dc.subject.thesozpanelen
dc.subject.thesozErhebungsmethodede
dc.subject.thesozdata collection methoden
dc.subject.thesozBefragungde
dc.subject.thesozsurveyen
dc.subject.thesozMessungde
dc.subject.thesozmeasurementen
dc.subject.thesozEinstellungde
dc.subject.thesozattitudeen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-342147
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Worksen
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10040714
internal.identifier.thesoz10035808
internal.identifier.thesoz10037911
internal.identifier.thesoz10037914
internal.identifier.thesoz10053256
internal.identifier.thesoz10054018
internal.identifier.thesoz10037921
internal.identifier.thesoz10037910
internal.identifier.thesoz10036930
internal.identifier.thesoz10036125
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo9de
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal472
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2013-00008
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence2
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record