dc.contributor.author | Heng, Pheakdey | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-02-19T09:38:59Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-02-19T09:38:59Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2012 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1868-4882 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/33245 | |
dc.description.abstract | China has re-emerged to become a dominant foreign player in Cambodia. Politically,
Cambodia is one of China’s oldest and closest allies. Economically, China is Cambodia’s
top foreign investor, a major donor, and an increasingly important trading partner.
Culturally, Chinese values are deeply embedded in many aspects of Cambodian society.
However, China’s dominance is surrounded by renewed controversies. While the government
warmly welcomes Chinese aid, saying that it comes with no strings attached, many experts
are concerned that China is providing aid for more nefarious reasons. Critics also
accuse Chinese investment and aid of having exacerbated corruption, weakened governance
and harmed human rights, and of ruining Cambodia’s natural resources and environment.
With such controversies, it is relevant and significant to assess the roles that China
has played and continues to play in Cambodia’s socio-economic development. Using expert
interviews, media analysis and an extensive literature review, this paper uniquely
contributes to the existing discussion on China–Cambodia relations by closely examining
the controversies of China’s investment and aid, critically analysing China’s interests
in Cambodia, and asking if the relationship between the two nations is a positive-sum
game. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Internationale Beziehungen | de |
dc.subject.ddc | International relations | en |
dc.subject.other | ODA; FDI; controversy; 1960-2010; qualitative judgmental sampling | |
dc.title | Cambodia-China relations: a positive-sum game? | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.identifier.url | http://hup.sub.uni-hamburg.de/giga/jsaa/article/view/545 | de |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs | |
dc.source.volume | 31 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | |
dc.source.issue | 2 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | International Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policy | en |
dc.subject.classoz | internationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | international relations | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | bilateral relations | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Interessenpolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | foreign investment | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | foreign policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Menschenrechte | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Kambodscha | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | environmental damage | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | China | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Cambodia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Southeast Asia | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | economic development (on national level) | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | pressure-group politics | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wirtschaftsbeziehungen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Südostasien | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Investitionspolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wirtschaftsentwicklung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | bilaterale Beziehungen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | human rights | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | investment policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umweltschaden | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Außenpolitik | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | internationale Beziehungen | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | economic relations | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | China | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Auslandsinvestition | de |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:gbv:18-4-5451 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GIGA | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042319 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034694 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036844 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040626 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060561 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040272 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037331 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10039288 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047745 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042902 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10048039 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10046249 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037282 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 57-85 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10505 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 193 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 327 | |
dc.subject.methods | descriptive study | en |
dc.subject.methods | deskriptive Studie | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 2 | |
internal.identifier.methods | 2 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |