dc.contributor.author | Biegelbauer, Peter | de |
dc.contributor.author | Hansen, Janus | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-11-05T12:38:16Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-11-05T12:38:16Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/32011 | |
dc.description.abstract | We argue that some of the controversies over the democratic merits of (participatory) technology assessment can be traced to conflicting assumptions about what constitutes a legitimate democratic procedure. We compare how two influential normative models of democracy – ‘representative’ and ‘direct’ – value public engagement processes according to different criteria. Criteria drawn from this
analysis are used to compare a series of case studies on xenotransplantation policy-making. We show that the democratic merits of participatory technology assessments probably owe as much to the institutional context as to the precise evaluative criteria or procedural designs. This calls for a closer interaction between science and technology studies research on public engagement and comparative politics scholarship. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Technik, Technologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Technology (Applied sciences) | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | Demokratietherorie; Participation; Participatory Technology Assessment | |
dc.title | Democratic Theory and Citizen Participation: democracy models in the evaluation of public participation in science and technology | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Science and Public Policy | |
dc.source.volume | 38 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | |
dc.source.issue | 8 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Technology Assessment | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Technikfolgenabschätzung | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture | en |
dc.subject.classoz | politische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kultur | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | technological progress | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | technical development | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | technischer Fortschritt | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Technikfolgenabschätzung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | citizens' participation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | direkte Demokratie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | conception of democracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Technologie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | politische Partizipation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | repräsentative Demokratie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | international comparison | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | technische Entwicklung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | science | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | governance | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Bürgerbeteiligung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Partizipation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | direct democracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Governance | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | Demokratieverständnis | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | political participation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | representative democracy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | participation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | internationaler Vergleich | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | technology assessment | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | technology | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-320110 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | WGL;aDIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036077 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10044004 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10060023 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042239 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040676 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040683 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047775 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10062479 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054194 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040671 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054891 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038842 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035297 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 589-598 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20800 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10504 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 277 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 600 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3152/030234211X13092649606404 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 1 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |