Zur Kurzanzeige

Der ISAF-Rückzug aus Afghanistan: Wahrnehmung und Reaktion regionaler Mächte
[Arbeitspapier]

dc.contributor.authorDestradi, Sandrade
dc.contributor.authorGodehardt, Nadinede
dc.contributor.authorFrank, Alexanderde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T12:28:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:47:38Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:47:38Z
dc.date.issued2012de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/31500
dc.description.abstractAt a conference in Tokyo on 8 July 2012, Afghanistan's donors pledged 16 billion USD in reconstruction aid over the next four years. At the NATO Summit in Chicago in May 2012, a comparable sum had been committed to supporting the Afghanistan National Security Forces (ANSF). Analysis: The international community is anxious to reassure the Afghan government that it will not be left to fend for itself after the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) troops are withdrawn at the end of 2014. Nevertheless, the fear remains that a power vacuum and another takeover by the Taliban could throw the country into turmoil once again. The destabilization of Afghanistan would most affect the neighboring countries. Yet despite sharing similar threat perceptions, these states are pursuing very different goals in Afghanistan that impede effective regional cooperation. The US, which would like to see its influence in Afghanistan maintained, curbs all initiatives that are not in line with its interests. The US is pursuing the vision of an economically integrated region in which Afghanistan will be the central stretch of a new “Silk Road” between Central and South Asia, and the Middle East and East Asia. The implicit notion is that economic integration will lead to increased stability in the security sector, but at best, that would only be attainable in the long term. In the short term, it is more likely that political differences between the regional states will hinder economic cooperation. China and India are aiming to more closely incorporate Afghanistan in regional organizations within their own spheres of influence. Both nations fear a post-2014 destabilization of Afghanistan that would directly affect their security – especially through the strengthening of Islamist terror groups. Other states are also concerned about the developments in Afghanistan. Iran, for example, is pursuing an ambivalent policy, fearing both the continuation of American influence after 2014 and a Taliban takeover.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherShanghai Cooperation Organization
dc.titleThe ISAF withdrawal from Afghanistan: perceptions and reactions of regional powersen
dc.title.alternativeDer ISAF-Rückzug aus Afghanistan: Wahrnehmung und Reaktion regionaler Mächtede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.volume5de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.publisher.cityHamburgde
dc.source.seriesGIGA Focus International Editionde
dc.subject.classozPeace and Conflict Research, International Conflicts, Security Policyen
dc.subject.classozFriedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozIndiende
dc.subject.thesozInteressenpolitikde
dc.subject.thesozmilitary presenceen
dc.subject.thesozpeacekeepingen
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Hilfede
dc.subject.thesozreconstructionen
dc.subject.thesozAfghanistande
dc.subject.thesozinternationale Zusammenarbeitde
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozTruppenreduzierungde
dc.subject.thesozmilitärische Präsenzde
dc.subject.thesozsecurity policyen
dc.subject.thesozinternational aiden
dc.subject.thesozUnited States of Americaen
dc.subject.thesozinternational cooperationen
dc.subject.thesozpressure-group politicsen
dc.subject.thesoztroop reductionen
dc.subject.thesozSicherheitspolitikde
dc.subject.thesozUSAde
dc.subject.thesozconflict managementen
dc.subject.thesozKonfliktregelungde
dc.subject.thesozFriedenssicherungde
dc.subject.thesozIndiaen
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozAfghanistanen
dc.subject.thesozWiederaufbaude
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-315004de
dc.date.modified2012-08-29T14:41:00Zde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitungde
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Worksen
ssoar.greylitfde
ssoar.gesis.collectionWGLde
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10042285
internal.identifier.thesoz10052316
internal.identifier.thesoz10051739
internal.identifier.thesoz10034673
internal.identifier.thesoz10037395
internal.identifier.thesoz10041244
internal.identifier.thesoz10042315
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10037376
internal.identifier.thesoz10044375
internal.identifier.thesoz10047745
internal.identifier.thesoz10034421
internal.identifier.thesoz10049492
dc.type.stockmonographde
dc.type.documentArbeitspapierde
dc.type.documentworking paperen
dc.rights.copyrighttde
dc.source.pageinfo8
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.classoz10507
internal.identifier.document3
dc.contributor.corporateeditorGIGA German Institute of Global and Area Studies - Leibniz-Institut für Globale und Regionale Studiende
internal.identifier.corporateeditor142de
internal.identifier.ddc327
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
internal.identifier.licence2
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
internal.identifier.series286de
ssoar.wgl.collectiontruede
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Dateien zu dieser Ressource

Thumbnail

Das Dokument erscheint in:

Zur Kurzanzeige