Volltext herunterladen
(557.5 KB)
Zitationshinweis
Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-288280
Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung
A constructive/ist response to Glaser's "Constructivist Grounded Theory?"
[Zeitschriftenartikel]
Abstract
"Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent... mehr
"Recent articles on the Grounded Theory Method (GTM) have started to analyze its conceptual and philosophical foundations. In particular it has been argued that the early characterizations by GLASER and STRAUSS exhibit a scientistic and positivist orientation that is no longer tenable. In her recent contribution to the GTM literature, CHARMAZ distinguished between objectivist GTM and constructivist GTM. This drew a response from Barney GLASER. What follows is a rejoinder to GLASER, offering some clarification of developments in people's understanding of this important and widely-used qualitative approach." (author's abstract)... weniger
Thesaurusschlagwörter
Grounded Theory; Forschungsansatz; qualitative Methode; Konstruktivismus
Klassifikation
Forschungsarten der Sozialforschung
Sprache Dokument
Englisch
Publikationsjahr
2007
Seitenangabe
S. 106-113
Zeitschriftentitel
Historical Social Research, Supplement (2007) 19
ISSN
0936-6784
Status
Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)