Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorReicher, Dieterde
dc.date.accessioned2011-11-23T10:28:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:28:16Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:28:16Z
dc.date.issued2010de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/27721
dc.description.abstractThe paper argues that the introduction of bureaucracy civilized death penalty and brutal punishment. The study bases on a quantitative analysis of the numbers of death sentences and executions in England and Habsburg Austria from 1700 to 1914 and on a qualitative analysis of historical literature about the death penalty in both countries. The paper shows that professional law enforcement specialists, bureaucrats, civil servants, and detached juridical stuff formed a new class of "domesticated middlemen elites". In strong states, this new class becomes the dominating group. In weak states, however, old elites that combine economic and political power preserve their privileged positions. For them capital punishment is the most proper mean to deter criminals because old elites fear the alternative: the introduction of strong-state institutions. Beside obvious power struggles between central and local elites—which effects penal policy pro and con capital punishment—there is a civilizing process going beneath the surface of rationality and political interests. In strong states, the formation of a "habitus" averse to brutal punishment is initiated amongst "domesticated middlemen elites" who are acting in peaceful living- and working conditions.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStaatsformen und Regierungssystemede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSystems of governments & statesen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.titleBureaucracy, "domesticated" elites, and the abolition of capital punishment: processes of state-formation and the number of executions in England and Habsburg Austria between 1700 and 1914en
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalCrime, Law and Social Changede
dc.source.volume54de
dc.publisher.countryNLD
dc.source.issue3-4de
dc.subject.classozStaat, staatliche Organisationsformende
dc.subject.classozCriminal Sociology, Sociology of Lawen
dc.subject.classozKriminalsoziologie, Rechtssoziologie, Kriminologiede
dc.subject.classozPolitical System, Constitution, Governmenten
dc.subject.thesozpoliceen
dc.subject.thesozdeath penaltyen
dc.subject.thesozstate formationen
dc.subject.thesozcentralizationen
dc.subject.thesozAustriaen
dc.subject.thesozZentralisierungde
dc.subject.thesozBürokratisierungde
dc.subject.thesozÖsterreichde
dc.subject.thesozsocial controlen
dc.subject.thesozTodesstrafede
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozPolizeide
dc.subject.thesozRechtde
dc.subject.thesozprosecutionen
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Kontrollede
dc.subject.thesozStaatenbildungde
dc.subject.thesozlawen
dc.subject.thesozbureaucratizationen
dc.subject.thesozStrafverfolgungde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-277217de
dc.date.modified2011-12-05T11:53:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10040018
internal.identifier.thesoz10052977
internal.identifier.thesoz10049691
internal.identifier.thesoz10044200
internal.identifier.thesoz10059426
internal.identifier.thesoz10040166
internal.identifier.thesoz10040087
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10040949
internal.identifier.thesoz10039946
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo279-297
internal.identifier.classoz10503
internal.identifier.classoz10214
internal.identifier.journal67de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc321
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10611-010-9258-1de
dc.subject.methodsempirischde
dc.subject.methodshistoricalen
dc.subject.methodsempiricalen
dc.subject.methodshistorischde
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.methods4
internal.identifier.methods9
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record