'Zwangskammerstaat'? Zur Demokratiequalität der Sozialpartnerschaft

Tálos, Emmerich

[research report]

dc.contributor.author	Tálos, Emmerich	de
dc.date.accessioned	2011-09-16T13:44:00Z	de
dc.date.accessioned	2012-08-29T22:40:35Z
dc.date.available	2012-08-29T22:40:35Z
dc.date.issued	1996	de
dc.identifier.uri	http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/26691
dc.description.abstract	"How can we judge the democratic quality of Austrian neo-corporatism («Kammersystem«) and cooperative decision making («Sozialpartnerschaft«)? The paper develops three main hypotheses. First, internal democracy within the existing centralized interest groups is fairly low while the practice of tripartite concertation between labour, business and state representatives is not democratically legitimized at all. Second, the general public expresses manifest discontent with present interest organizations while still valuing positively their policy style of cooperative as well as secretive elite bargaining. Thus, degrees of public approval are apparently unrelated to degrees of democratic legitimation. Third, if they want to survive Austrian chambers of labor and business will have to adopt innovative strategies to increase both formal and material legitimation." [autho's abstract]	en
dc.language	de	de
dc.subject.ddc	Staatsformen und Regierungssysteme	de
dc.subject.ddc	Systems of governments & states	en
dc.title	'Zwangskammerstaat'? Zur Demokratiequalität der Sozialpartnerschaft	de
dc.source.volume	29	de
dc.publisher.country	AUT
dc.publisher.city	Wien	de
dc.source.series	Reihe Politikwissenschaft / Institut für Höhere Studien, Abt. Politikwissenschaft	de
dc.subject.classoz	Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen	de
dc.subject.classoz	Political System, Constitution, Government	en
dc.subject.thesoz	quality	en
dc.subject.thesoz	formulation of political objectives	en
dc.subject.thesoz	politische Willensbildung	de
dc.subject.thesoz	Austria	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Demokratie	de
dc.subject.thesoz	Österreich	de
dc.subject.thesoz	Neokorporatismus	de
dc.subject.thesoz	legitimation	en
dc.subject.thesoz	democracy	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Qualität	de
dc.subject.thesoz	politische Institution	de
dc.subject.thesoz	politischer Akteur	de
dc.subject.thesoz	political institution	en
dc.subject.thesoz	political actor	en
dc.subject.thesoz	Legitimation	de
dc.subject.thesoz	neo-corporatism	en
dc.identifier.urn	urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-266910	de
dc.date.modified	2011-09-16T14:52:00Z	de
dc.rights.licence	Deposit Licence - Keine Weiterverbreitung, keine Bearbeitung	de
dc.rights.licence	Deposit Licence - No Redistribution, No Modifications	en
ssoar.greylit	f	de
ssoar.gesis.collection	SOLIS;ADIS	de
internal.status	3	de
internal.identifier.thesoz	10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz	10037327
internal.identifier.thesoz	10049787
internal.identifier.thesoz	10050763
internal.identifier.thesoz	10047603
internal.identifier.thesoz	10040166
internal.identifier.thesoz	10064200
internal.identifier.thesoz	10054914
dc.type.stock	monograph	de
dc.type.document	research report	en
dc.type.document	Forschungsbericht	de
dc.rights.copyright	f	de
dc.source.pageinfo	20
internal.identifier.classoz	10503
internal.identifier.document	12
dc.contributor.corporateeditor	Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Wien	de
internal.identifier.corporateeditor	191	de
internal.identifier.ddc	321
dc.description.pubstatus	Published Version	en
dc.description.pubstatus	Veröffentlichungsversion	de
internal.identifier.licence	3
internal.identifier.pubstatus	1
internal.identifier.series	458	de
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer	CERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizer	CERTAIN_RETAINED

Files in this item

Name:: ssoar-1996-talos-zwangskammers ...
Size:: 47.97Kb
Format:: PDF

View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Staat, staatliche Organisationsformen
Political System, Constitution, Government

Show simple item record