dc.contributor.author | Prooijen, Jan-Willem van | de |
dc.contributor.author | Cremer, David de | de |
dc.contributor.author | Beest, Ilja van | de |
dc.contributor.author | Ståhl, Tomas | de |
dc.contributor.author | Dijke, Marius van | de |
dc.contributor.author | Lange, Paul A. M. van | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2011-08-10T03:06:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-29T23:02:20Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-29T23:02:20Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2008 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/26288 | |
dc.description.abstract | In four studies, the authors investigated the individual-oriented versus social-oriented nature of procedural justice effects by comparing fairness-based responses to decision-making procedures among proself versus prosocial oriented individuals. In Studies 1 through 3, we measured participants' social value orientation and manipulated whether or not they were granted or denied voice in a decision-making process. Results consistently revealed that the effects of voice versus no-voice on fairness-based perceptions, emotions, and behavioral intentions were significantly more pronounced for individuals with proself orientations than for individuals with prosocial orientations. These findings were extended in Study 4, a field study in which perceived procedural justice was a stronger predictor of satisfaction and organizational citizenship behaviors among proselfs than among prosocials. These findings suggest that procedural justice effects can be accounted for by self-oriented motives or needs, rather than prosocial motives that are often conceptualized as being associated with justice. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Psychology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Psychologie | de |
dc.subject.other | Procedural justice; Social value orientation; Social decision making; Egocentrism | |
dc.title | The egocentric nature of procedural justice: social value orientation as moderator of reactions to decision-making procedures | en |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology | de |
dc.source.volume | 44 | de |
dc.publisher.country | NLD | |
dc.source.issue | 5 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Social Psychology | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Sozialpsychologie | de |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-262881 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2011-08-10T09:27:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | SOLIS;ADIS | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | http://www.peerproject.eu/ | de |
internal.status | 3 | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.rights.copyright | f | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 1303-1315 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10706 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 199 | de |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 150 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.05.006 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 7 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 2 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |