Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKing, Melaniede
dc.contributor.authorLoddington, Stevede
dc.contributor.authorManuel, Suede
dc.contributor.authorOppenheim, Charlesde
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01T06:47:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-30T04:47:54Z
dc.date.available2012-08-30T04:47:54Z
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/23145
dc.description.abstractThe last couple of years have brought a rise in the number of institutional repositories throughout the world and within UK Higher Education institutions, with the majority of these repositories being devoted to research output. Repositories containing teaching and learning material are less common and the workflows and business processes surrounding these types of repositories were unclear. The user motivations to contributing to and downloading from repositories were also unknown. This article reports on two studies: a wide-scale survey carried out with HE staff to identify barriers and incentives to contributing to teaching material repositories; and interviews carried out as part of a workflow study at Loughborough University, to identify existing practice in the creation and sharing of teaching material. Confusion is reported with regard to the difference between a Virtual Learning Environment (VLE) and a repository. However, many different purposes of a teaching and learning material repository are highlighted. This article discusses how repositories could successfully interoperate with other institutional applications and highlights the benefits of teaching material repositories to the user, through scenarios. Recommendations relating to the key aspects of the design and implementation of a repository service are outlined.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.otherbusiness processes; e-learning; HE; Higher Education; institutional repository; repository; repository workflows;
dc.titleAnalysis of academic attitudes and existing processes to inform the design of teaching and learning material repositoriesen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalActive Learning in Higher Educationde
dc.source.volume9de
dc.source.issue2de
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-231452de
dc.date.modified2011-03-01T06:47:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status-1de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.source.pageinfo103-121
internal.identifier.journal8de
internal.identifier.document32
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1469787408090838de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record