Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorRutherford, Paulde
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01T06:15:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:46:17Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:46:17Z
dc.date.issued2006de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22964
dc.description.abstractOne group of discourses often neglected within the study of international environmental politics are those of business actors. Comparing two key events in international environmental politics, the 1992 Rio Earth Summit and the 2002 Johannesburg Earth Summit, provides an excellent opportunity to examine the changing character of business discourse over time. This article systematically analyses and compares the business–environment discourses of two books written for the summits respectively, representing the view of the international business community: Changing Course (1992) and Walking the Talk (2002). The comparison of both texts reveals some continuity but also major changes. One area of continuity is that business discourses on the environment attempt to mask a traditionally antagonistic view of environmental issues. Major changes include an increasing willingness to reach accommodation with environmental non-governmental organizations and a desire to overcome business's traditionally defensive, reactive role. Characterizing this is the adoption of a proactive approach to shaping the international environmental agenda. The article also discusses the significance of these findings for our understanding of the environmental role of business in a globalized society.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcInternationale Beziehungende
dc.subject.ddcÖkologiede
dc.subject.ddcEcologyen
dc.subject.ddcInternational relationsen
dc.subject.otherbusiness; discourse analysis; hegemony; sustainable development
dc.titleHow Have International Business Discourses on the Environment Changed over the Last Decade?en
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalGlobal Social Policyde
dc.source.volume6de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozÖkologie und Umweltde
dc.subject.classozEcology, Environmenten
dc.subject.classozInternational Relations, International Politics, Foreign Affairs, Development Policyen
dc.subject.classozinternationale Beziehungen, Entwicklungspolitikde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-229645de
dc.date.modified2011-09-29T10:23:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo79-105
internal.identifier.classoz20900
internal.identifier.classoz10505
internal.identifier.journal144de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc327
internal.identifier.ddc577
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1468018106061393de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record