Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorSifakakis, Spyrosde
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-01T05:34:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:30:25Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:30:25Z
dc.date.issued2007de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/22718
dc.description.abstractWhile postmodernist claims for contemporary art's pluralism, inclusive character and interpenetration with everyday cultures proliferate, little attention is paid to the actual practices, discourses and realities of the art world, its institutions and the interest groups that are involved. Based on findings of the author's recent ethnographic research on a leading contemporary art gallery in Britain and through an analysis of art's audiences as an insider construct, this article argues that a distinction exists between informed and uninformed audiences which is directly associated with two competing types of cultural recognition. These are specialist accreditation and public recognition; the domination of the former in their struggle is presented as decisive in art's socio-cultural legitimization and as manifest in the content and limited range of the audience as an insider discourse.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.otherart galleries; audiences; contemporary art; discourse; institutionalized artistic production; legitimacy; postmodernism; public recognition; specialist accreditation;
dc.titleContemporary art's audiences: specialist accreditation and the myth of inclusionen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Cultural Studiesde
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozKultursoziologie, Kunstsoziologie, Literatursoziologiede
dc.subject.classozCultural Sociology, Sociology of Art, Sociology of Literatureen
dc.subject.thesozsocial recognitionen
dc.subject.thesozKunstkritikde
dc.subject.thesozRezeptionde
dc.subject.thesozKunstde
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Anerkennungde
dc.subject.thesozaudienceen
dc.subject.thesozDiskursde
dc.subject.thesozdiscourseen
dc.subject.thesozPublikumde
dc.subject.thesozGroßbritanniende
dc.subject.thesozExpertede
dc.subject.thesozreceptionen
dc.subject.thesozPostmodernede
dc.subject.thesozLaiede
dc.subject.thesozexperten
dc.subject.thesozarten
dc.subject.thesozGegenwartde
dc.subject.thesozart criticismen
dc.subject.thesozpostmodernismen
dc.subject.thesozGreat Britainen
dc.subject.thesozlaypersonen
dc.subject.thesozpresenten
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-227182de
dc.date.modified2011-05-02T08:52:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10044730
internal.identifier.thesoz10041158
internal.identifier.thesoz10050127
internal.identifier.thesoz10050337
internal.identifier.thesoz10035568
internal.identifier.thesoz10050443
internal.identifier.thesoz10039299
internal.identifier.thesoz10055053
internal.identifier.thesoz10042102
internal.identifier.thesoz10043021
internal.identifier.thesoz10055755
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo203-223
internal.identifier.classoz10216
internal.identifier.journal114de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/1367549407075908de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerSKIPPED_NO_READABLE_TEXT


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record