![]()
Download full text
 (137.0Kb)
Citation Suggestion
Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-224324
Exports for your reference manager
Framing effects on risk perception of nanotechnology
[journal article]
Abstract How do people judge nanotechnology risks that are completely unfamiliar to them?                Drawing on results of previous studies on framing and risk perception, two                hypotheses about potential influences on nanotechnology risk perception were                examined in an experim... view more
 How do people judge nanotechnology risks that are completely unfamiliar to them?                Drawing on results of previous studies on framing and risk perception, two                hypotheses about potential influences on nanotechnology risk perception were                examined in an experimental study: 1) Risk perception of nanotechnology is                influenced by its benefit perception. 2) Risk perception of nanotechnology is                influenced by the context in which nanotechnology is embedded, specifically by the                characteristics of the enterprises that profit from nanotechnology: large                multinational enterprises versus small and medium-sized enterprises. In contrast to                findings for other new technologies, e.g. biotechnology, the different types of                benefit did not affect risk perceptions in our study. However, we found that                characterizing the enterprises as large multinational versus small or medium-sized                leads to differences in risk perception. One can speculate that when personal                knowledge about a technology is lacking, people use more familiar aspects from the                social context as cues for their risk evaluation.... view less
Free Keywords
risk perception; nanotechnology; benefits; framing; social characteristics.;
Document language
English
Publication Year
2008
Page/Pages
p. 369-379
Journal
Public Understanding of Science, 17 (2008) 3
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662506071282
Status
Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence
		
			PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)