• Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • Contact
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.


Download full text

(108.8Kb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-223831

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • E-Mail
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • reddit
  • LinkedIn
  • XING
  • VK

Did Kettlewell commit fraud? Re-examining the evidence

[journal article]

Rudge, David Wÿss

Abstract

H.B.D. Kettlewell is famous for several investigations conducted in the early 1950s on the phenomenon of industrial melanism, which are widely regarded as the classic demonstration of natural selection. In a recent (2002) book-length popularization of thi... view more

H.B.D. Kettlewell is famous for several investigations conducted in the early 1950s on the phenomenon of industrial melanism, which are widely regarded as the classic demonstration of natural selection. In a recent (2002) book-length popularization of this episode in the history of the science, science writer Judith Hooper draws attention to what she interprets as discrepancies in the results reported by Kettlewell in his first scientific papers on the subject. On the basis of correspondence among Kettlewell and his associates, a survey of scientific publications that mention outstanding questions surrounding the phenomenon, as well as interviews with his son, surviving colleagues, and scientists who have worked on industrial melanism, Hooper all but explicitly concludes that Kettlewell committed fraud. The following essay critically examines her evidence in support of this allegation, including her discussion of his character, the alleged motives, and whether fraud was even committed. None of Hooper’s arguments is found to withstand careful scrutiny. The concluding section draws several conclusions about how history of science should be depicted to the public.... view less

Document language
English

Publication Year
2005

Page/Pages
p. 249-268

Journal
Public Understanding of Science, 14 (2005) 3

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662505052890

Status
Postprint; peer reviewed

Licence
PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)


Home  |  Contact  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2018 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2017, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


Home  |  Contact  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2018 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2017, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.