%T Is work in Europe decent? A study based on the 4th European survey of working conditions 2005
%A Tangian, Andranik S.
%P 153
%V 157
%D 2007
%= 2011-03-14T17:33:00Z
%~ USB Köln
%> http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-219237
%U http://www.boeckler.de/pdf/p_wsi_diskp_157_e.pdf
%X "Composite indicators of Decent work for 31 European countries are constructed with
the data of the Fourth European Working Conditions Survey 2005 (EWCS 2005). Partial
indices reflect 15 aspects of working conditions as in the recently published German DGB-index Gute-Arbeit. In a sense, the German indicator is extended to European data. Two
methodologies, of the OECD and of the Hans Böckler Foundation, differing in scaling,
give very similar results. The main findings are as follows:
1. Evaluation of working conditions. Working conditions are evaluated on the
average with 61 conditional % (= low medium level), ranging from 51 in Turkey
(inferior level) to 67 in Switzerland (upper medium level). A good evaluation (> 80)
is inherent only in the meaningfulness of work (81). Two aspects got a bad evaluation
(< 50): qualification and development possibilities (33) and career chances (49).
2. Importance of different aspects of working conditions. Stepwise regression
reveals that job stability is the most important factor for the satisfaction with work-
ing conditions. Strains, career chances, meaningfulness of work go next. Income and
collegiality are ranked 5th or 6th, depending on the evaluation method. Creativity
and industrial culture make no statistically significant impact. Learning and good
management are regarded as shortcomings rather than as advantages.
3. Disparities among countries and social groups. The evaluation shows significant disparities among European countries and social groups. Those who work in finances have by far better working conditions, even comparing with the next best
group of business people, women have worse working conditions than men with respect to 9 of 15 aspects, and all types of atypical employees (other than permanent
employees) have working conditions below the European average, to say nothing of
those with permanent contract.
4. Insufficient quality of work. The evaluation reveals bad qualification possibilities
(33) and career chances (49), low transparency (51), emotional strains (52), inconvenient time arrangements (55), and modest income (55) show how far is Europe from
creating 'more and better jobs' for the Agenda 2010. In particular, poor qualification and development possibilities mean that the European Employment Strategy
oriented towards flexible employment and life-long learning is not yet consistently
5. Role of strong trade unions for job stability. A high job stability is observed in
some countries with relaxed employment protection and strong trade unions. At the
same time, a low job stability is inherent in some countries with strict employment
protection but weak trade unions. It means that the institutional employment
protection alone does not guarantee job stability, and other factors, like strong
trade unions, can be even more important.
To stimulate employers to equalize working conditions it is proposed to introduce a
workplace tax for bad working conditions which should protect 'the working environment' in the same way as the green tax protects the natural environment. Indexing working conditions at every workplace developed in our study can be regarded as prototype measuring
the 'social pollution' and used to determine the tax amount." (author's abstract)
%X Der Bericht entwickelt auf der Basis von Daten des 4. European Working Conditions Survey 2005 (EWCS 2005) für 31 europäische Länder länderübergreifende Indikatoren für 'Gute Arbeit'. In Anlehnung an den DBG-Index 'Gute Arbeit' werden insgesamt 15 Aspekte der Arbeitsbedingungen auf ihre Qualität hin überprüft und verglichen. Dabei zeigt sich, dass sowohl die Untersuchungen der OECD als auch die der Hans-Böckler-Stiftung, die aufgrund unterschiedlicher methodischer Ansätze zu unterschiedlichen Einstufungen einzelner Länder führen, im Kern zu ähnlichen Ergebnissen kommen. Der Vergleich der Arbeitsbedingungen erfolgt unter fünf Hauptaspekten: 1. Evaluation der Arbeitsbedingungen; 2. Bedeutung verschiedener Aspekte von Arbeitsbedingungen; 3. Disparitäten zwischen Ländern und sozialen Gruppen; 4. unzureichende Arbeitsqualität; 5. die Rolle starker Gewerkschaften für die Jobstabilität. Um die Arbeitsgeber dazu zu bewegen, die Arbeitsbedingungen anzugleichen, wird empfohlen, eine Arbeitsplatzsteuer für schlechte Arbeitsbedingungen zu erheben, mit dem Ziel, die Arbeitsumwelt zu schützen. (IAB)
%C Deutschland
%C Düsseldorf
%G en
%9 monograph
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info