Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPierro, Antoniode
dc.contributor.authorLeder, Susannede
dc.contributor.authorMannetti, Luciade
dc.contributor.authorHiggins, E. Toryde
dc.contributor.authorKruglanski, Arie W.de
dc.contributor.authorAiello, Antoniode
dc.date.accessioned2011-02-06T02:57:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T23:02:10Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T23:02:10Z
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/21572
dc.description.abstractThe present studies examined the influence of two regulatory mode concerns—a locomotion concern with movement from state to state and an assessment concern with making comparisons [see Higgins, E. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Pierro, A. (2003). Regulatory mode: Locomotion and assessment as distinct orientations. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 293–344). New York: Academic Press]—on engaging in counterfactual thinking and experiencing post-decisional regret. When contemplating a decision with a negative outcome, it was predicted that high (vs. low) locomotion would induce less counterfactual thinking and less regret, whereas the opposite would be true for high (vs. low) assessment. Locomotion and assessment orientations were measured as chronic individual differences in Study 1 and 2, and were induced experimentally in Study 3. In Study 1 and 3 a purchase scenario with a negative outcome was used to elicit counterfactuals and regret, while in Study 2 participants were asked to recall one of their own personal purchases that had a negative outcome. The results supported our predictions. We discuss the implications of these findings for the nature of counterfactual thinking and regret from the perspective of their relation to regulatory mode.en
dc.languageen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologyen
dc.subject.ddcPsychologiede
dc.subject.otherRegulatory mode; Regret; Counterfactual thinking
dc.titleRegulatory Mode Effects On Counterfactual Thinking and Regreten
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Experimental Social Psychologyde
dc.source.volume44de
dc.publisher.countryNLD
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozSocial Psychologyen
dc.subject.classozSozialpsychologiede
dc.subject.thesozthinkingen
dc.subject.thesozdecision making processen
dc.subject.thesozcognitive abilityen
dc.subject.thesozregulationen
dc.subject.thesozkognitive Fähigkeitde
dc.subject.thesozRegulierungde
dc.subject.thesozEntscheidungsprozessde
dc.subject.thesozDenkende
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-215723de
dc.date.modified2011-02-07T11:17:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10042188
internal.identifier.thesoz10040717
internal.identifier.thesoz10039952
internal.identifier.thesoz10040725
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo321-329
internal.identifier.classoz10706
internal.identifier.journal199de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc150
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.06.002de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_CHANGED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record