Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorDaher, Hanande
dc.contributor.authorFlessa, Steffende
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-11T04:06:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:26:02Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:26:02Z
dc.date.issued2009de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/20359
dc.description.abstractBackground: Microfinance is a generally accepted tool for improving the economic situation of the poor in developing countries. However, it has hardly been used to finance medical devices required by the disabled, although the incapability of these groups to buy wheelchairs and other equipment is a major source of poverty. Aim: This paper analyzes the need for microfinance as a tool for financing wheelchairs for patients suffering from a walking disability and oxygen concentrators for patients with chronic lung diseases. It is not in the scope of this study to present a comprehensive concept of implementing a microfinance instrument, but the paper intends to demonstrate that the disabled in Syria perceive a great need for such a financing tool. In addition, this paper wants to encourage microfinance institutions to go beyond their traditional field of business and start lending to the disabled so that they can buy the equipment necessary to live a productive life of higher quality. Methodology: Two groups of disabled patients in Syria were asked about their social and economic situation as well as their access to financing tools. The first sample consisted of patients suffering from a walking disability with major constraints concerning their mobility and who are in need of a wheelchair (N = 100). The second sample consisted of patients with chronic lung diseases (N = 90) and with a need of additional oxygen. All participants lived below the national poverty line. Results: Eighty-two percent of the interviewees suffering from a walking disability and 78% of the interviewees with chronic lung diseases were not health-insured. Although there was some knowledge of microfinance among the interviewees, they reported having limited or no access to such programs. Seventy-two percent of the patients with a walking disability and 68% of the patients with chronic lung diseases knew what microfinance is, but the portion of borrowers was 24% of the examined patients with a walking disability and 22% of the patients with chronic lung diseases. Ninety percent of the patients with a walking disability and 73% of the patients with a chronic lung disease are convinced that they could generate income if they could only buy a wheelchair or an oxygen concentrator. The majority, i.e., 89% of the patients with a walking disability and 95% of the patients with a chronic lung disease, believed that microfinance would be an ideal tool for them to finance these devices and that they or their family could pay back the installments. Conclusion: Microfinance has not been used as a tool for financing medical devices in Syria. However, this study shows that the disabled of this country perceive a great need for this innovative system. The majority of the disabled believe that they could gain some income and pay back the loan if they had the necessary equipment. This is a basic prerequisite for further steps to start microfinance for this group of potential clients. However, a start-up would need some support, e.g., by the government of Syria. It is likely that the financing of medical devices by microfinance can also be used for other groups of patients and needy persons in Syria as well as in comparable countries, but this statement calls for further research.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.otherDisability; Medical devices; Microfinance; Poverty; Syria
dc.titleMicrofinance as a tool for financing medical devices in Syria. An assessment of needs and a call for further researchen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Public Healthde
dc.source.volume18de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozEntwicklungsländersoziologie, Entwicklungssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozHealth Policyen
dc.subject.classozSociology of Developing Countries, Developmental Sociologyen
dc.subject.classozGesundheitspolitikde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-203596de
dc.date.modified2010-11-12T10:50:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo189-197
internal.identifier.classoz10211
internal.identifier.classoz11006
internal.identifier.journal203de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc300
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0290-5de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record