Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorPorzsolt, Franzde
dc.contributor.authorHölzel, Dieterde
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-11T04:03:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:28:57Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:28:57Z
dc.date.issued2009de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/20349
dc.description.abstractAim: Analysis of the hypothesis that 22% of breast cancer cases detected by screening mammography would disappear spontaneously. Methods: Critical appraisal of the relevant scientific literature using established methods. Results: The hypothesis—although it is unusual—seems to be very well supported by data from several independent research groups and justifies three lessons. Conclusions: First, it is necessary to complete the last step of the concept of traditional evidence-based medicine (EBM), i.e., to confirm that the outcome that is predicted by scientific evidence will also be observed in daily clinical practice. Second, the focus of medical teaching should be directed to final clinical outcomes and patient benefit rather than surrogate parameters, such as completed procedures or test results. Third, the availability of data to answer unsolved questions may become a more important indicator for high-quality health-care systems than the performance of services of unknown incremental value.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.otherSpontaneous remissions; Breast cancer; Mammography
dc.titleSpontaneous remissions in breast cancer underline the need of more evidence: screening should not detect more cancer but earlier canceren
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalJournal of Public Healthde
dc.source.volume18de
dc.publisher.countryDEU
dc.source.issue1de
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-203492de
dc.date.modified2010-11-12T15:31:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo15-19
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal203de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10389-009-0275-4de
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record