dc.contributor.author | Zabala-Iturriagagoitia, Jon Mikel | de |
dc.contributor.author | Voigt, Peter | de |
dc.contributor.author | Gutiérrez-Gracia, Antonio | de |
dc.contributor.author | Jiménez-Sáez, Fernando | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2010-09-03T02:54:00Z | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2012-08-29T22:34:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2012-08-29T22:34:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2007 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | http://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13292 | |
dc.description.abstract | This paper applies Data Envelopment Analysis [DEA] methodology to the evaluation of regional innovation system performance based on information provided by the European Innovation Scoreboard [EIS] for 2002 and 2003. We find that those European regions ranked in the EIS as showing better performance in high-technology areas, are ranked somewhat differently according to DEA. The results of our study show that the higher the technological level of a region, the greater is the need for system coordination. Where this is lacking there is a loss of performance efficiency compared to other similar regions. Policy making in relation to Regional Innovation Systems (RIS) has in the past depended on systemic analysis. Here, we propose a methodology that combines quantitative and qualitative analyses to enrich the knowledge base for future policy decision making. | en |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Landscaping and area planning | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Sociology & anthropology | en |
dc.subject.ddc | Städtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltung | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Soziologie, Anthropologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.title | Regional Innovation Systems: How to Assess Performance | en |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Regional Studies | de |
dc.source.volume | 41 | de |
dc.publisher.country | GBR | |
dc.source.issue | 5 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Special areas of Departmental Policy | en |
dc.subject.classoz | spezielle Ressortpolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Wissenschaftssoziologie, Wissenschaftsforschung, Technikforschung, Techniksoziologie | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Area Development Planning, Regional Research | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Sociology of Science, Sociology of Technology, Research on Science and Technology | en |
dc.subject.classoz | Raumplanung und Regionalforschung | de |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-132922 | de |
dc.date.modified | 2011-03-14T11:07:00Z | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | de |
dc.rights.licence | PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project) | en |
ssoar.gesis.collection | SOLIS;ADIS | de |
ssoar.contributor.institution | http://www.peerproject.eu/ | de |
internal.status | 3 | de |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.rights.copyright | f | de |
dc.source.pageinfo | 661-672 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10508 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10220 | |
internal.identifier.classoz | 20700 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 710 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 301 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400601120270 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | en |
dc.description.pubstatus | Postprint | de |
internal.identifier.licence | 7 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 2 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizer | CERTAIN | |
internal.check.languageharmonizer | CERTAIN_RETAINED | |