Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorHanley, Pamde
dc.contributor.authorMaringe, Felixde
dc.contributor.authorRatcliffe, Maryde
dc.date.accessioned2010-09-01T04:26:00Zde
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-29T22:58:30Z
dc.date.available2012-08-29T22:58:30Z
dc.date.issued2008de
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/13259
dc.description.abstractThis evaluation used a change transition model to explore the processes of development of a three-phase professional programme devised by two teams of researchers to support teachers’ expertise in six domains of science teaching. The full programme operated over two years. Interviews with developers at the end of each phase (21 interviews) and with teachers at the end of phases two and three (11 interviews) formed the main data set. The four features of the change transition model – trigger, vision, conversion, maintenance – were used as a framework for analysis of the qualitative data. Four themes emerged as contributing to the success of the process of development of the programme: establishing a shared vision of the goals of the programme and its outcomes; maintaining flexibility in implementing the phases and details of the programme; negotiating common understanding with participants; and ensuring fruitful collaboration in planning and implementation. The demands of attending to all of these features should not be underestimated in any successful developmental process. The evaluation thus provides evidence for additional guidance in future collaborative professional development.en
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcWirtschaftde
dc.subject.ddcEconomicsen
dc.subject.ddcBildung und Erziehungde
dc.subject.ddcEducationen
dc.subject.otherteacher development; professional development; science teacher
dc.titleEvaluation of professional development: deploying a process focused modelen
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalInternational Journal of Science Educationde
dc.source.volume30de
dc.publisher.countryGBR
dc.source.issue5de
dc.subject.classozBerufsforschung, Berufssoziologiede
dc.subject.classozLehrende, Erziehende, Lernendede
dc.subject.classozOccupational Research, Occupational Sociologyen
dc.subject.classozTeachers, Students, Pupilsen
dc.subject.thesozEvaluationde
dc.subject.thesozevaluationen
dc.subject.thesozchange managementen
dc.subject.thesozChange Managementde
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-132598de
dc.date.modified2010-09-01T09:54:00Zde
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)de
dc.rights.licencePEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)en
ssoar.gesis.collectionSOLIS;ADISde
ssoar.contributor.institutionhttp://www.peerproject.eu/de
internal.status3de
internal.identifier.thesoz10039188
internal.identifier.thesoz10078571
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.rights.copyrightfde
dc.source.pageinfo711-725
internal.identifier.classoz20102
internal.identifier.classoz10615
internal.identifier.journal171de
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc370
internal.identifier.ddc330
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701854899de
dc.subject.methodsempirischde
dc.subject.methodsevaluationen
dc.subject.methodsempiricalen
dc.subject.methodsEvaluationde
dc.description.pubstatusPostprinten
dc.description.pubstatusPostprintde
internal.identifier.licence7
internal.identifier.methods7
internal.identifier.methods4
internal.identifier.pubstatus2
internal.identifier.review1
internal.check.abstractlanguageharmonizerCERTAIN
internal.check.languageharmonizerCERTAIN_RETAINED


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record