SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(external source)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.10548

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Reproductive Equity Support: A Cross‐National Comparison of Medically Assisted Reproduction and Abortion Policies

[journal article]

Tamakoshi, Mio
Zagel, Hannah

Abstract

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional fra... view more

This article offers a new way of classifying and measuring state support for reproductive equity across countries, focusing on medically assisted reproduction (MAR) and abortion. Drawing on the notion of stratified reproduction and comparative welfare state research, we propose a two‐dimensional framework to capture how policies can shape different sets of inequalities and how access to reproductive care is provided. The two dimensions that compose our framework are "permissiveness," the degree to which government policies enable access to reproductive care by legalizing services, defining who qualifies as a patient, and/or imposing restrictive measures on service delivery, and "generosity," the extent to which government policies subsidize the costs of authorized services for individuals deemed eligible. We applied the permissiveness-generosity framework to quantitative data on MAR and abortion policies from 2020 from the International Reproduction Policy Database across 30 high‐income countries. We then investigated the cases of Austria, Germany, and Switzerland, which group together in the overall plotting, more in‐depth. The quantitative mapping revealed diverse approaches to reproductive equity, with some countries having both permissive and generous policies, while others focus on one dimension or provide limited support altogether. The case studies show that despite overall trends towards greater reproductive equity in recent decades, state support for individuals' equal access to MAR and abortion remains limited and has taken different pathways in this group of countries. This study contributes to a better understanding of how state policies promote equal access to reproductive care and enable individuals to pursue their desired reproductive pathways, regardless of their characteristics or socioeconomic position.... view less

Keywords
Federal Republic of Germany; Austria; Switzerland; abortion; welfare state; reproductive medicine; equality of rights; medical care

Classification
Medical Sociology

Free Keywords
medically assisted reproduction; reproductive equity; stratified reproduction

Document language
English

Publication Year
2025

Journal
Social Inclusion, 13 (2025)

Issue topic
Contemporary Changes in Medically Assisted Reproduction: The Role of Social Inequality and Social Norms

ISSN
2183-2803

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.