Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorArzheimer, Kaide
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-23T13:55:17Z
dc.date.available2025-09-23T13:55:17Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn1460-3683de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/105017
dc.description.abstractThe rise of the far right is increasingly raising the question of whether partisanship can have negative consequences for democracy. While issues such as partisan bias and affective polarization have been extensively researched, little is known about the relationship between identification with anti-system parties and diffuse system support. I address this gap by introducing a novel indicator and utilising the GESIS panel dataset, which tracks the rise of a new party, Alternative for Germany (AfD) from 2013, when the party was founded, to 2017, when the AfD, now transformed into a right-wing populist and anti-system party, entered the federal parliament for the first time. Employing a panel fixed effects design, I demonstrate that identification with Alternative for Germany reduces trust in the Federal Constitutional Court by a considerable margin. These findings are robust across various alternative specifications, suggesting that the effects of anti-system party identification should not be dismissed.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otheranti-system parties; party identification; radical right parties; GESIS Panel - Standard Edition (ZA5665); Allgemeine Bevölkerungsumfrage der Sozialwissenschaften ALLBUS 2018 (ZA5270)de
dc.titleIdentification with an anti-system party undermines diffuse political support: The case of Alternative for Germany and trust in the Federal Constitutional Courtde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalParty Politics
dc.source.volume31de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozBundesrepublik Deutschlandde
dc.subject.thesozFederal Republic of Germanyen
dc.subject.thesozParteide
dc.subject.thesozpartyen
dc.subject.thesozVertrauende
dc.subject.thesozconfidenceen
dc.subject.thesozrechtsextreme Parteide
dc.subject.thesozright-wing extremist partyen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozMitgliedschaftde
dc.subject.thesozmembershipen
dc.subject.thesozSystemkritikde
dc.subject.thesozsystem criticismen
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-105017-4
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht-kommerz. 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10037571
internal.identifier.thesoz10036000
internal.identifier.thesoz10061508
internal.identifier.thesoz10054100
internal.identifier.thesoz10040704
internal.identifier.thesoz10045697
internal.identifier.thesoz10050125
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo397-409de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal552
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/13540688241237493de
dc.subject.methodskeine Angabede
dc.subject.methodsnot specifieden
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence32
internal.identifier.methods10
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record