Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorThørnblad, Reneede
dc.contributor.authorSkoglund, Jeanettede
dc.date.accessioned2025-09-15T12:09:46Z
dc.date.available2025-09-15T12:09:46Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2803de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/104798
dc.description.abstractIn Norway, as elsewhere, child welfare services have long prioritised placing children in foster homes over residential care when children cannot live with their parents, to ensure upbringing in family settings. Today, it is also stated in the law that child welfare services must always consider whether anyone in the child's family or close network could be chosen as foster parents. The idea has been that kinship foster care can safeguard the child's cultural identity, continuity in social networks, and family connections. Parallel with the prioritisation of foster care and kinship foster care, foster care has become increasingly professionalised. In the Norwegian context, the possible unintended consequences of increased professionalisation have been minimally addressed. This article aims to contribute to vitalising this discussion about some of the unintended consequences professionalisation may have for safeguarding the values associated with foster care in general, and particularly for kinship foster care. For our discussion, focusing particularly on economic conditions, we draw on both our own and others' research related to foster care. Using concepts from sociological theory on different rationalities or logics as a basis for action, we illustrate and discuss how instrumental rationality and the field logic of child welfare have increasingly influenced the conditions for foster homes.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziale Probleme und Sozialdienstede
dc.subject.ddcSocial problems and servicesen
dc.subject.otherchild welfare services; foster care; kinship foster care; payment; reimbursementde
dc.titleThe Professionalisation of Foster Care in Norwayde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalSocial Inclusion
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozSozialwesen, Sozialplanung, Sozialarbeit, Sozialpädagogikde
dc.subject.classozSocial Work, Social Pedagogics, Social Planningen
dc.subject.thesozProfessionalisierungde
dc.subject.thesozprofessionalizationen
dc.subject.thesozJugendhilfede
dc.subject.thesozyouth welfareen
dc.subject.thesozKindde
dc.subject.thesozchilden
dc.subject.thesozNorwegende
dc.subject.thesozNorwayen
dc.subject.thesozPflegefamiliede
dc.subject.thesozfoster familyen
dc.subject.thesozPflegekindde
dc.subject.thesozfoster childen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038286
internal.identifier.thesoz10048218
internal.identifier.thesoz10034597
internal.identifier.thesoz10053375
internal.identifier.thesoz10043229
internal.identifier.thesoz10048764
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz20603
internal.identifier.journal786
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc360
dc.source.issuetopicMoney in Foster Care: Social Issues in Paid Parenthoodde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.10604de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/10604
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record