Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorBeese, Floriande
dc.contributor.authorWachtler, Benjaminde
dc.contributor.authorGrabka, Markus M.de
dc.contributor.authorBlume, Miriamde
dc.contributor.authorKersjes, Christinade
dc.contributor.authorGutu, Robertde
dc.contributor.authorMauz, Elvirade
dc.contributor.authorHoebel, Jensde
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-23T07:17:20Z
dc.date.available2025-07-23T07:17:20Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn1471-2458de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/103942
dc.description.abstractBackground: Psychosocial stress is considered a risk factor for physical and mental ill-health. Evidence on socioeconomic inequalities with regard to the psychosocial consequences of the COVID-19 pandemic in Germany is still limited. We aimed to investigate how pandemic-induced psychosocial stress (PIPS) in different life domains differed between socioeconomic groups. Methods: Data came from the German Corona-Monitoring nationwide study - wave 2 (RKI-SOEP-2, November 2021-February 2022). PIPS was assessed using 4-point Likert scales with reference to the following life domains: family, partnership, own financial situation, psychological well-being, leisure activity, social life and work/school situation. Responses were dichotomised into "not stressed/slightly stressed/rather stressed" (0) versus "highly stressed" (1). The sample was restricted to the working-age population in Germany (age=18-67 years, n=8,402). Prevalence estimates of high PIPS were calculated by sex, age, education and income. Adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) were estimated using Poisson regression to investigate the association between education/income and PIPS; high education and income were the reference groups. Results: The highest stress levels were reported in the domains social life and leisure activity. Women and younger participants reported high stress levels more frequently. The highest inequalities were found regarding people's own financial situation, and PIPS was higher in low vs. high income groups (PR 5.54, 95% CI 3.61-8.52). Inequalities were also found regarding partnerships with higher PIPS in low vs. high education groups (PR 1.68, 95% CI 1.13-2.49) - and psychological well-being with higher PIPS in low vs. high income groups (PR 1.52, 95% CI 1.14-2.04). Conclusion: Socioeconomic inequalities in PIPS were found for different life domains. Generally, psychosocial support and preventive interventions to help people cope with stress in a pandemic context should be target-group-specific, addressing the particular needs and circumstances of certain socioeconomic groups.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherPsychosocial stress; COVID-19 pandemic, RKI-SOEP-2; Life domains; Mikrozensusde
dc.titleSocioeconomic inequalities in pandemic-induced psychosocial stress in different life domains among the working-age populationde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalBMC Public Health
dc.source.volume24de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.subject.classozMedizinsoziologiede
dc.subject.classozMedical Sociologyen
dc.subject.thesozpsychosoziale Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozpsychosocial factorsen
dc.subject.thesozsozioökonomische Lagede
dc.subject.thesozsocioeconomic positionen
dc.subject.thesozStressde
dc.subject.thesozpsychophysical stressen
dc.subject.thesozEpidemiede
dc.subject.thesozepidemicen
dc.subject.thesozsozioökonomische Faktorende
dc.subject.thesozsocioeconomic factorsen
dc.subject.thesozProblembewältigungde
dc.subject.thesozcopingen
dc.subject.thesozCoping-Verhaltende
dc.subject.thesozcoping behavioren
dc.identifier.urnurn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-103942-5
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionFDBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10055729
internal.identifier.thesoz10058210
internal.identifier.thesoz10036144
internal.identifier.thesoz10042424
internal.identifier.thesoz10053635
internal.identifier.thesoz10055288
internal.identifier.thesoz10038047
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo1-11de
internal.identifier.classoz10215
internal.identifier.journal2013
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-024-18874-3de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.pdf.validtrue
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record