Show simple item record

Abuse of Procedural Right in the Review of Judicial Acts in the Civil Process
[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorMelnikova, Anastasia V.de
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-11T10:02:35Z
dc.date.available2025-07-11T10:02:35Z
dc.date.issued2023de
dc.identifier.issn3034-2813de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/103556
dc.description.abstractThe purpose of this article is to analyze abuses of procedural right in civil and arbitrazh proceedings of the Russian Federation in the context of judicial review. The problem posed by the author is studied from "general" to "specific": from the study of the potential for abuse of the right to appeal to the isolation and isolation of separate blocks of bad faith procedural behavior, typical for persons involved in the case. The author was able to identify four blocks of procedural abuse at the appeal stage: attempts to review judicial acts not in the manner prescribed by applicable law; circumvention of the prohibition to submit new evidence; inconsistent procedural conduct, as well as unreasonably prolonging the process of review. In addition, this article raises the question of the applicability of certain negative consequences for abusers in appellate and subsequent court proceedings. The article draws a conclusion about correlation of special norms (part 2 of article 111, part 5 of article 159 of the Commercial Procedure Code of the Russian Federation, article 99 of the Civil Procedure Code of the Russian Federation) with a basic general consequence of mala fide procedural behaviour - refusal to satisfy claims of an abuser fully or partially.de
dc.languagerude
dc.subject.ddcRechtde
dc.subject.ddcLawen
dc.subject.othercivil proceedings; arbitrazh proceedings; abuse of procedural rights; judicial reviewde
dc.titleЗлоупотребление процессуальным правом при пересмотре судебных актов в цивилистическом процессеde
dc.title.alternativeAbuse of Procedural Right in the Review of Judicial Acts in the Civil Processde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtetde
dc.description.reviewrevieweden
dc.source.journalTheoretical and Applied Law
dc.publisher.countryRUSde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozRechtde
dc.subject.classozLawen
dc.subject.thesozBeschwerdede
dc.subject.thesozappealen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung, Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10038783
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo87-92de
internal.identifier.classoz40101
internal.identifier.journal2995
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc340
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2023-2-87-92de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence24
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review2
dc.subject.classhort40100de
internal.pdf.validfalse
internal.pdf.wellformedtrue
internal.pdf.encryptedfalse
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record