Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorShani, Maorde
dc.contributor.authorBerns, Marjoriede
dc.contributor.authorBergen, Lucyde
dc.contributor.authorRichters, Stefaniede
dc.contributor.authorKrämer, Kristinade
dc.contributor.authorLede, Sophie dede
dc.contributor.authorZalk, Maarten H. W.de
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-10T14:13:30Z
dc.date.available2025-06-10T14:13:30Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2803de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/102872
dc.description.abstractAffective polarization, characterized by emotional hostility and behavioral avoidance toward ideological opponents beyond mere policy disagreements, can pose a significant threat to social cohesion. However, this phenomenon remains relatively unexplored in adolescence. This longitudinal study investigates whether perceived inclusivity norms - emphasizing equality‐based respect, open and constructive dialogue, and communal unity - reduce opinion‐based affective polarization among adolescents. Using a sample of 839 students from two demographically distinct German secondary schools (grades 7-11), we developed and validated measures of polarization tailored to adolescents, capturing dialogue orientation and social distance toward ideological outgroups. Results revealed stable ideological subgroup differences in norms and attitudes, with conservative students exhibiting lower descriptive and prescriptive inclusivity norms and higher affective polarization compared to their liberal peers. However, a significant proportion of adolescents demonstrated fluid political orientations over time, highlighting the malleability of early political identities. Cross‐lagged analyses showed no evidence that inclusivity norms directly reduce affective polarization, although early dialogue orientation significantly predicted greater social openness in diverse settings. Our findings advance the understanding of adolescent political identity development by demonstrating that while ideological orientations remain unstable during this period, group‐based differences in norm perceptions and polarization tendencies are already evident. We emphasize how this developmental fluidity presents both opportunities and challenges for interventions, suggesting that effective depolarization strategies must account for the distinct characteristics of adolescent political socialization and the varying influence of school‐based normative contexts.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcSoziologie, Anthropologiede
dc.subject.ddcSociology & anthropologyen
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otheraffective polarization; inclusivity norms; political intolerance; political polarization; school norms; social normsde
dc.titleLongitudinal Associations Between Perceived Inclusivity Norms and Opinion Polarization in Adolescencede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/10122/4418de
dc.source.journalSocial Inclusion
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozJugendsoziologie, Soziologie der Kindheitde
dc.subject.classozSociology of the Youth, Sociology of Childhooden
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozJugendlicherde
dc.subject.thesozadolescenten
dc.subject.thesozDialogde
dc.subject.thesozdialogueen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Distanzde
dc.subject.thesozsocial distanceen
dc.subject.thesozsoziale Normde
dc.subject.thesozsocial normen
dc.subject.thesozPolarisierungde
dc.subject.thesozpolarizationen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Identitätde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical identityen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Einstellungde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical attitudeen
dc.subject.thesozpolitische Sozialisationde
dc.subject.thesozpolitical socializationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10035322
internal.identifier.thesoz10040996
internal.identifier.thesoz10058149
internal.identifier.thesoz10045314
internal.identifier.thesoz10063279
internal.identifier.thesoz10070990
internal.identifier.thesoz10041739
internal.identifier.thesoz10054881
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10210
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal786
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc301
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.source.issuetopicThe Impact of Social Norms on Cohesion and (De)Polarizationde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.10122de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/10122
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record