Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorCazzamatta, Reginade
dc.date.accessioned2025-06-02T09:26:53Z
dc.date.available2025-06-02T09:26:53Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/102744
dc.description.abstractThis article examines how European international news agencies - Reuters, Agence France-Presse (AFP), Deutsche Presse-Agentur (dpa), and EFE - engage with the emerging subgenre of external fact-checking journalism in response to (dysfunctional) hybrid media systems. Through a content analysis of 860 verification articles published between January and December 2022 and interviews with seven experts, the study demonstrates that (external) fact-checking practices are deeply embedded in these agencies' operations, leveraging extensive global communication networks to deliver timely and accurate verifications, reinforcing journalistic authority in the digital age. Partnerships with tech platforms were viewed as a strategic opportunity, a sustainable digital-age revenue stream at the time, enabling the creation of dedicated fact-checking units to combat disinformation. Nonetheless, these agencies prioritize verifying content from ordinary social media users over domestic political claims stated by public figures, with 90% to 100% of their articles focusing on online rumors, except for dpa. Key selection criteria include virality, particularly on Meta platforms, timeliness, and social impact. Despite criticisms, the collaboration between historically influential global news agencies and tech platforms offers critical insights into the workings of (dysfunctional) hybrid media systems.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherexternal fact-checking; fact-checking; gatebouncers; global news agencies; hybrid media systems; information disorderde
dc.titleFact-Checkers as New Journalistic Mediators: News Agencies' Verification Units and Platform Dynamicsde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/9867/4385de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozKommunikatorforschung, Journalismusde
dc.subject.classozCommunicator Research, Journalismen
dc.subject.thesozDesinformationde
dc.subject.thesozdisinformationen
dc.subject.thesozJournalismusde
dc.subject.thesozjournalismen
dc.subject.thesozNachrichtenagenturde
dc.subject.thesoznews agencyen
dc.subject.thesozMediende
dc.subject.thesozmediaen
dc.subject.thesozSystemde
dc.subject.thesozsystemen
dc.subject.thesozFalschmeldungde
dc.subject.thesozfalse reporten
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10063936
internal.identifier.thesoz10034699
internal.identifier.thesoz10034698
internal.identifier.thesoz10035302
internal.identifier.thesoz10035350
internal.identifier.thesoz10063949
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz1080406
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicJournalism in the Hybrid Media Systemde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9867de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9867
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record