dc.contributor.author | Schröder, Jette | de |
dc.contributor.author | Schmiedeberg, Claudia | de |
dc.contributor.author | Brüderl, Josef | de |
dc.contributor.author | Bozoyan, Christiane | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-05-22T07:34:56Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-05-22T07:34:56Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2025 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1864-3361 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/102521 | |
dc.description.abstract | Based on a mode experiment implemented in pairfam, a large, established German panel study, we investigate whether switching a panel from face-to-face to push-to-web survey mode leads to increased attrition and selectivity. We find that the redesign increases overall attrition by almost six percentage points, and causes even larger losses among full-time employed, self-employed, and less educated respondents. Two of the Big Five personality traits moderate the mode effect: conscientiousness and openness, while no differences are found for agreeableness, neuroticism, and extraversion. These results suggest that mode changes in a panel study bear risk for data quality in terms of sample size and selectivity. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Sozialwissenschaften, Soziologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Social sciences, sociology, anthropology | en |
dc.subject.other | mode; self-administered; face-to-face; response; bias; experiment | de |
dc.title | Switching a Face-to-Face Panel to Self-Administered Survey Modes: Experimental Evidence on Effects of Mode Assignment on Response and Selectivity | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Survey Research Methods | |
dc.source.volume | 19 | de |
dc.publisher.country | DEU | de |
dc.source.issue | 1 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Methods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methods | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Panel | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | panel | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Interview | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | interview | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Online-Befragung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | online survey | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Antwortverhalten | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | response behavior | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datengewinnung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data capture | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Datenqualität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | data quality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Umfrageforschung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | survey research | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-102521-8 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | GESIS | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10054018 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037910 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037913 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037911 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10035808 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040547 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055811 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10040714 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 1-11 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10105 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 674 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 300 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.18148/srm/2025.v19i1.8427 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
ssoar.wgl.collection | true | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |