Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorQuinlan, Stephende
dc.contributor.authorLewis-Beck, Michael S.de
dc.contributor.authorQvortrup, Mattde
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-28T09:51:42Z
dc.date.available2025-04-28T09:51:42Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2463de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/101898
dc.description.abstractElection prediction flourishes among pollsters, the media, academics, and political anoraks, with four significant prognostic paradigms: opinion polls, markets, structural models, and hybrid approaches. Structural models, inspired by political science theory and based on so-called "fundamental" indicators, have a long pedigree in predicting government performance in elections cross-nationally. Despite their prevalence and prowess in forecasting contests for government, these structural models have not been applied to predict referendums, where the prognosis game, as far as it exists, primarily relies on polls. Perhaps this is unsurprising given that plebiscites can be especially hard to forecast given that citizens often vote on complex subjects not always salient in public discourse, partisan cues are sometimes lacking, and late opinion shifts are arguably more common than in elections. In this contribution, we break new ground by fusing two strands of political science literature - election forecasting and referendums - and devise a prediction model of plebiscites based on economic, institutional, and historical variables, thereby providing the first structural forecasting model to account for referendum adoption and support levels. We apply this model ex-post to 42 national referendums in Ireland between 1968 and 2024 to test its applicability ex-ante. In Europe, Ireland stands third only to Switzerland and Italy as polities that regularly employ referendums to decide public policy issues. With reasonable lead time, ex-post estimates of our model offer solid predictions of the referendums' outcome, with out-of-sample estimates calling the outcome correctly 68%-79% of the time, a remarkable feat given that the issues up for decision are varied. Moreover, we demonstrate that our model’s predictions are competitive with opinion poll estimates of these contests, illustrating that while our model is not a panacea, it provides a reasonable starting point for predicting the outcomes of referendums in Ireland and, importantly, plants a vital seed for future work on forecasting plebiscites using model approaches.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.ddcSozialwissenschaften, Soziologiede
dc.subject.ddcSocial sciences, sociology, anthropologyen
dc.subject.otherforecastingde
dc.titleForecasting Referendums: A Structural Model Predicting Adoption and Support in Irish Plebiscites 1968-2024de
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/article/view/9378/4349de
dc.source.journalPolitics and Governance
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.classozErhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaftende
dc.subject.classozMethods and Techniques of Data Collection and Data Analysis, Statistical Methods, Computer Methodsen
dc.subject.thesozIrlandde
dc.subject.thesozIrelanden
dc.subject.thesozVolksentscheidde
dc.subject.thesozreferendumen
dc.subject.thesozStrukturmodellde
dc.subject.thesozstructural modelen
dc.subject.thesozPrognosede
dc.subject.thesozprognosisen
dc.subject.thesozWahlforschungde
dc.subject.thesozelection researchen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10048086
internal.identifier.thesoz10061649
internal.identifier.thesoz10052566
internal.identifier.thesoz10036432
internal.identifier.thesoz10054727
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.classoz10105
internal.identifier.journal787
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
internal.identifier.ddc300
dc.source.issuetopicCleavage Referendums: Ideological Decisions and Transformational Political Changede
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/pag.9378de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/politicsandgovernance/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9378
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record