Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKittel, Rebecca C.de
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T14:07:23Z
dc.date.available2025-04-22T14:07:23Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn1475-6765de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/101750
dc.description.abstractPopulism research has found much scholarly and public attention alike in recent years. Most research has focused on how populism can be defined, assessed or even measured. Even though there are emerging studies on populist messages, few of them have paid attention on causally identifying ways in which discourse can affect support for populist actors. This article positions itself within this gap and aims to answer which discursive elements make (non‐)populist messages appealing to varying groups of people. To answer this research question, I conducted a novel survey experiment on vote choice in Germany from December 2020 to January 2021 with N = 3325. Respondents were asked to choose between two candidate statements that displayed varying discursive elements. Thus, the experiment causally tested whether people‐centric rhetoric, blame attributive languages or populist style focusing on language complexity drive the populist vote. Results show that a neutral form of blame attribution, namely towards politicians, had the highest probability of driving vote choice, irrespective of respondents' underlying ideological preferences or populist attitudes. Simple language nearly always has a negative effect on vote choice, whereas people‐centrism adds a positive touch. These results show that there may be an increasing dissatisfaction with democracy that is voiced by blaming political elites for the malfunctioning of society.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPolitikwissenschaftde
dc.subject.ddcPolitical scienceen
dc.subject.otherblame attribution; language complexity; wahlvsurvey experimentde
dc.titleLet's talk populist? A survey experiment on effects of (non‐) populist discourse on vote choicede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Political Research
dc.source.volume64de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue2de
dc.subject.classozpolitische Willensbildung, politische Soziologie, politische Kulturde
dc.subject.classozPolitical Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Cultureen
dc.subject.thesozPopulismusde
dc.subject.thesozpopulismen
dc.subject.thesozSprachgebrauchde
dc.subject.thesozlanguage usageen
dc.subject.thesozRhetorikde
dc.subject.thesozrhetoricen
dc.subject.thesozWahlverhaltende
dc.subject.thesozvoting behavioren
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionWZBde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10055018
internal.identifier.thesoz10041831
internal.identifier.thesoz10056758
internal.identifier.thesoz10061173
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo719-743de
internal.identifier.classoz10504
internal.identifier.journal118
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc320
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12710de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.econstor.eu/oai/request@@oai:econstor.eu:10419/311287
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record