Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorWinkler, Tanjade
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T13:10:11Z
dc.date.available2025-04-22T13:10:11Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-7635de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/101734
dc.description.abstractMore than 40 years of neoliberal globalization have led to a democratic deficit that necessitates urgent redress. Democracy otherwise - which is grounded in decoloniality and its accompanying epistemologies of the South - provides urban and regional planners with an opportunity to learn from the diverse democratic practices emerging in the Global South, practices that are deliberately delinked from the state and capitalism. One such example is found on communal landholdings in South Africa, where residents deploy multiple principles of legitimacy to foster an emplaced democracy. But given the entwined relationship between planning and the state, and the state's support of market rationalities, decoloniality urges us to question whether alternative democratic practices are possible beyond local settings. Findings presented in this article suggest that place dependency diminishes transferability and scalability. Nevertheless, herein lies the power of an otherwise democracy to counter coloniality, while keeping alive Derrida's "always to come" narrative, which challenges the liberal tradition of democracy as the only and most profitable outcome. This perspective enables planners to learn from the South - not to replicate its rich diversity, but to appreciate multiple democratic possibilities that acknowledge pluriversality, relationality, popular knowledges, local experiences, and situated worldviews, while nurturing "polities of difference" and "becoming in place," in tandem with "idioms of autonomy and community."de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcStädtebau, Raumplanung, Landschaftsgestaltungde
dc.subject.ddcLandscaping and area planningen
dc.subject.otherRural Women's Movement; coloniality; epistemologies of the South; liberal democracyde
dc.titleDemocracy Otherwise: Learning From the Southde
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/article/view/8909/4332de
dc.source.journalUrban Planning
dc.source.volume10de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozRaumplanung und Regionalforschungde
dc.subject.classozArea Development Planning, Regional Researchen
dc.subject.thesozFrauenbewegungde
dc.subject.thesozwomen's movementen
dc.subject.thesozDemokratiede
dc.subject.thesozdemocracyen
dc.subject.thesozRepublik Südafrikade
dc.subject.thesozRepublic of South Africaen
dc.subject.thesozStadtplanungde
dc.subject.thesozurban planningen
dc.subject.thesozRegionalplanungde
dc.subject.thesozregional planningen
dc.subject.thesozEntkolonialisierungde
dc.subject.thesozdecolonizationen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10044089
internal.identifier.thesoz10037672
internal.identifier.thesoz10039716
internal.identifier.thesoz10035393
internal.identifier.thesoz10044630
internal.identifier.thesoz10040635
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz20700
internal.identifier.journal794
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc710
dc.source.issuetopicThe Role of Planning in 'Anti-Democratic' Timesde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/up.8909de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/urbanplanning/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/8909
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record