Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorKim, Sunghwande
dc.contributor.authorJung, Jaeminde
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-22T10:50:49Z
dc.date.available2025-04-22T10:50:49Z
dc.date.issued2025de
dc.identifier.issn2183-2439de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/101726
dc.description.abstractTechnological progress breeds both innovation and potential risks, a duality exemplified by the recent debate over generative artificial intelligence (GAI). This study examines how GAI has become a perceived risk in the Korean public sphere. To explore this, we analyzed news articles (N = 56,468) and public comments (N = 68,393) from early 2023 to mid-2024, a period marked by heightened interest in GAI. Our analysis focused on articles mentioning "generative artificial intelligence." Using the social amplification of risk framework (Kasperson et al., 1988), we investigated how risks associated with GAI are amplified or attenuated. To identify key topics, we employed the bidirectional encoder representations from transformers model on news content and public comments, revealing distinct media and public agendas. The findings show a clear divergence in risk perception between news media and public discourse. While the media's amplification of risk was evident, its influence remained largely confined to specific amplification stations. Moreover, the focus of public discussion is expected to shift from AI ethics and regulatory issues to the broader consequences of industrial change.de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcPublizistische Medien, Journalismus,Verlagswesende
dc.subject.ddcNews media, journalism, publishingen
dc.subject.otherAI; ChatGPT; amplification stations; generative AI; public discourse; risk amplification; risk attenuationde
dc.titleHow Generative AI Went From Innovation to Risk: Discussions in the Korean Public Spherede
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/9523/4319de
dc.source.journalMedia and Communication
dc.source.volume13de
dc.publisher.countryPRTde
dc.subject.classozMedieninhalte, Aussagenforschungde
dc.subject.classozMedia Contents, Content Analysisen
dc.subject.classozWirkungsforschung, Rezipientenforschungde
dc.subject.classozImpact Research, Recipient Researchen
dc.subject.thesozkünstliche Intelligenzde
dc.subject.thesozartificial intelligenceen
dc.subject.thesozRisikokommunikationde
dc.subject.thesozrisk communicationen
dc.subject.thesoztechnische Entwicklungde
dc.subject.thesoztechnical developmenten
dc.subject.thesozSüdkoreade
dc.subject.thesozSouth Koreaen
dc.subject.thesozöffentliche Meinungde
dc.subject.thesozpublic opinionen
dc.subject.thesozRisikode
dc.subject.thesozrisken
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10043031
internal.identifier.thesoz10049300
internal.identifier.thesoz10042239
internal.identifier.thesoz10049780
internal.identifier.thesoz10052047
internal.identifier.thesoz10045555
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
internal.identifier.classoz1080405
internal.identifier.classoz1080407
internal.identifier.journal793
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc070
dc.source.issuetopicAI, Media, and People: The Changing Landscape of User Experiences and Behaviorsde
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.17645/mac.9523de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/oai/@@oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/9523
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

No Thumbnail [100%x80]

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record