Endnote export

 

%T A Heated Debate: Meta-Theoretical Studies on Current Climate Research and Public Understanding of Science
%A Sojka, Maria M.
%P 226
%D 2023
%I transcript Verlag
%K Analytical Philosophy; Climate Science; Computer Simulations; Cosmology (Philosophy of nature); Culture and institutions; Economics of land and energy; Environmental policy and protocols; Ethics and moral philosophy; Factors affecting social behavior; Geisteswissenschaften allgemein; Humankind; Macroeconomics and related topics; Occupational ethics; Other ethical norms; Other philosophical systems and doctrines; Philosophy and psychology; Philosophy of Nature; Philosophy of Science; Philosophy of science; Philosophy: epistemology and theory of knowledge; Philosophy: metaphysics and ontology; Political science (Politics and government); Sociology and anthropology; Tacit Knowledge
%@ 2702-9018
%@ 978-3-8394-6580-6
%~ transcript Verlag
%> https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-101573-8
%U https://www.transcript-verlag.de/shopMedia/openaccess/pdf/oa9783839465806.pdf
%X Ever since climate change has been identified as one of the most significant challenges of humanity, climate change deniers have repeatedly tried to discredit the work of scientists. To show how these processes work, Maria M. Sojka examines three ideals about how science should operate. These ideals concern the understanding of uncertainties, the relationship between models and data, and the role of values in science. Their widespread presence in the public understanding of science makes it easy for political and industrial stakeholders to undermine inconvenient research. To address this issue, Sojka analyses the importance of tacit knowledge in scientific practice and the question of what defines an expert.
%C DEU
%C Bielefeld
%G en
%9 Monographie
%W GESIS - http://www.gesis.org
%~ SSOAR - http://www.ssoar.info