Show simple item record

[journal article]

dc.contributor.authorJiang Fu, Lande
dc.date.accessioned2025-04-10T08:42:29Z
dc.date.available2025-04-10T08:42:29Z
dc.date.issued2024de
dc.identifier.issn1868-4874de
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/101416
dc.description.abstractFrom the beginning of the twenty-first century onwards, China has witnessed a Confucian revival in the business world. Often associated with a revitalisation of cultural tradition among the population, this new trend is characterised by a resurgence of the Confucian merchant (儒商, rushang) model, an ancient term that originally referred to a new type of merchants in the Ming Dynasty (1368-1644), who were close to literati circles. In parallel with this increasing interest in Confucianism by many economic elites, there has been an integration of certain elements of Confucianism into official political discourse through various moral edification campaigns. Based on an analysis of this new official discourse and the fieldwork we carried out between 2016 and 2020 within three private companies, this article aims to analyse interactions between three elements: Confucianism, party-state power, and business leaders claiming to be "Confucian."de
dc.languageende
dc.subject.ddcGeschichtede
dc.subject.ddcHistoryen
dc.subject.otherPolitische Partei; Traditionale Kultur; Verhältnis Kunst/Kultur - Politik/Gesellschaft; Volksrepublik China; Wirtschaftsunternehmende
dc.titleConfucianism, business leaders, and party-state power in contemporary Chinade
dc.description.reviewbegutachtet (peer reviewed)de
dc.description.reviewpeer revieweden
dc.identifier.urlhttps://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/18681026241226984de
dc.source.journalJournal of Current Chinese Affairs
dc.source.volume53de
dc.publisher.countryGBRde
dc.source.issue3de
dc.subject.classozSozialgeschichte, historische Sozialforschungde
dc.subject.classozSocial History, Historical Social Researchen
dc.subject.thesozWirtschaftselitede
dc.subject.thesozeconomic eliteen
dc.subject.thesozKonfuzianismusde
dc.subject.thesozConfucianismen
dc.subject.thesozChinade
dc.subject.thesozChinaen
dc.subject.thesozParteide
dc.subject.thesozpartyen
dc.subject.thesozUnternehmerde
dc.subject.thesozentrepreneuren
dc.subject.thesozUnternehmende
dc.subject.thesozenterpriseen
dc.subject.thesoztraditionelle Kulturde
dc.subject.thesoztraditional cultureen
dc.subject.thesozInterdependenzde
dc.subject.thesozinterdependenceen
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0de
dc.rights.licenceCreative Commons - Attribution 4.0en
ssoar.contributor.institutionGIGAde
internal.statusformal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossende
internal.identifier.thesoz10041894
internal.identifier.thesoz10049529
internal.identifier.thesoz10040272
internal.identifier.thesoz10036000
internal.identifier.thesoz10060836
internal.identifier.thesoz10039009
internal.identifier.thesoz10050183
internal.identifier.thesoz10047710
dc.type.stockarticlede
dc.type.documentZeitschriftenartikelde
dc.type.documentjournal articleen
dc.source.pageinfo453-476de
internal.identifier.classoz30302
internal.identifier.journal192
internal.identifier.document32
internal.identifier.ddc900
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1177/18681026241226984de
dc.description.pubstatusVeröffentlichungsversionde
dc.description.pubstatusPublished Versionen
internal.identifier.licence16
internal.identifier.pubstatus1
internal.identifier.review1
internal.dda.referencehttps://unapi.k10plus.de@@1914744047
ssoar.urn.registrationfalsede


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record