dc.contributor.author | Korostelev, Stanislav | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-14T08:21:23Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-14T08:21:23Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2017 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1726-1139 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/100757 | |
dc.description.abstract | This article addresses the issue of legitimizing some types of activities of states countering
the terrorist threat originating from the territory of other states. In different documents
equivalent actions are defined by diverse terms (political assassination, targeted liquidation,
targeted elimination, execution without due process, extrajudicial execution), which creates
significant difficulties in the process of coordinating the willpower of states in pursue of their
national security objectives. In a number of cases, it is possible to eliminate the terminological inconsistency by determining the actions carried out by the armed forces in terms of
international humanitarian law. In this case, some actions of the armed forces formations
within the territory of failed states aimed at the elimination of key terrorist figures to be
defined as "targeted killing". This solution facilitates the task of assigning of international
responsibility. | de |
dc.language | ru | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Politikwissenschaft | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Political science | en |
dc.subject.other | use of force; political and legal justification; countering terrorism; armed conflict; international humanitarian law; targeted killing | de |
dc.title | О проблеме терминологической несогласованности процесса легитимации действий по противодействию террористической угрозе | de |
dc.title.alternative | To the Issue of Nonconcurrence of Definitions in a Context of Legitimization of Counterterrorism Operations | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet | de |
dc.description.review | reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Administrative Consulting | |
dc.publisher.country | RUS | de |
dc.source.issue | 7 | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Friedens- und Konfliktforschung, Sicherheitspolitik | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Peace and Conflict Research, International Conflicts, Security Policy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Legitimität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | legitimacy | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Interpretation | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | interpretation | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Terrorismusbekämpfung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | fight against terrorism | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | nationale Sicherheit | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | national security | en |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10050767 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10037480 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10081893 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10042911 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 25-36 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10507 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 2857 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 320 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.22394/1726-1139-2017-7-25-36 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 2 | |
dc.subject.classhort | 10500 | de |
dc.subject.classhort | 40100 | de |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |
ssoar.urn.registration | false | de |