SSOAR Logo
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • English 
    • Deutsch
    • English
  • Login
SSOAR ▼
  • Home
  • About SSOAR
  • Guidelines
  • Publishing in SSOAR
  • Cooperating with SSOAR
    • Cooperation models
    • Delivery routes and formats
    • Projects
  • Cooperation partners
    • Information about cooperation partners
  • Information
    • Possibilities of taking the Green Road
    • Grant of Licences
    • Download additional information
  • Operational concept
Browse and search Add new document OAI-PMH interface
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Download PDF
Download full text

(2.415Mb)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:
https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-100268-0

Exports for your reference manager

Bibtex export
Endnote export

Display Statistics
Share
  • Share via E-Mail E-Mail
  • Share via Facebook Facebook
  • Share via Bluesky Bluesky
  • Share via Reddit reddit
  • Share via Linkedin LinkedIn
  • Share via XING XING

Why courts are the life buoys of migrant rights: anti-immigrant pressure, variation in judicial independence, and asylum recognition rates

[journal article]

Zaun, Natascha
Leroch, Martin
Thielemann, Eiko

Abstract

A rise in anti-immigrant pressure can reduce asylum recognition rates, irrespective of individuals' protection needs. Independent courts, which often act as a safeguard of migrant rights vis-à-vis such pressures, have been subject to increasing political interference. Yet, we know very little about ... view more

A rise in anti-immigrant pressure can reduce asylum recognition rates, irrespective of individuals' protection needs. Independent courts, which often act as a safeguard of migrant rights vis-à-vis such pressures, have been subject to increasing political interference. Yet, we know very little about how variation in the level of judicial independence - especially among lower courts - affects policy outcomes. In this paper, we assess the impact of anti-immigrant pressure and judicial independence on first and final instance refugee status determination decisions across 28 European Union member states over a ten-year period (2008-2018). We find that the relative independence of courts makes the biggest difference in asylum recognition rates at first and final instance when levels of anti-immigrant pressure are particularly high. This effect can be demonstrated not just regarding asylum appeals, but also for first instance decisions, suggesting that independent courts can have a liberal ‘foreshadowing effect’ on national asylum agencies.... view less

Keywords
EU member state; Eurobarometer; EU; refugee; immigration; xenophobia; law; judge; political independence; political influence; court

Classification
Migration, Sociology of Migration
Political Process, Elections, Political Sociology, Political Culture
Judiciary

Free Keywords
anti-immigrant pressure; judicial independence; non-majoritarian institutions; refugee recognition rates; refugee status determination; Eurobarometer 57.2OVR (Apr-Jun 2002) (ZA3641 v1.0.1); Eurobarometer 62.0 (Oct-Nov 2004) (ZA4229 v1.1.0); Eurobarometer 66.2 (Oct-Nov 2006) (ZA4527 v1.0.1); Eurobarometer 70.1 (Oct-Nov 2008) (ZA4819 v3.0.2); Eurobarometer 74.2 (2010) (ZA5449 v2.2.0); Eurobarometer 78.1 (2012) (ZA5685 v2.0.0); Eurobarometer 82.3 (2014) (ZA5932 v3.0.0); Eurobarometer 90.3 (2018) (ZA7489 v1.0.0); Eurobarometer 86.2 (2016) (ZA6788 v1.5.0)

Document language
English

Publication Year
2024

Page/Pages
p. 1206-1230

Journal
Journal of European Public Policy, 31 (2024) 5

DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2023.2182821

ISSN
1466-4429

Status
Published Version; peer reviewed

Licence
Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.
 

 


GESIS LogoDFG LogoOpen Access Logo
Home  |  Legal notices  |  Operational concept  |  Privacy policy
© 2007 - 2025 Social Science Open Access Repository (SSOAR).
Based on DSpace, Copyright (c) 2002-2022, DuraSpace. All rights reserved.