dc.contributor.author | Andorfer, Andrea | de |
dc.contributor.author | Kraler, Sabina | de |
dc.contributor.author | Kaufmann, Paul | de |
dc.contributor.author | Pollheimer, Ewald | de |
dc.contributor.author | Spah, Christoph | de |
dc.contributor.author | Fuchshuber, Jürgen | de |
dc.contributor.author | Rominger, Christian | de |
dc.contributor.author | Traunmüller, Claudia | de |
dc.contributor.author | Schwerdtfeger, Andreas | de |
dc.contributor.author | Unterrainer, Human-Friedrich | de |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-02-19T08:08:43Z | |
dc.date.available | 2025-02-19T08:08:43Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | de |
dc.identifier.issn | 1664-0640 | de |
dc.identifier.uri | https://www.ssoar.info/ssoar/handle/document/100124 | |
dc.description.abstract | Objectives: Mindfulness-based interventions (including self-compassion interventions) are effective in improving stress management at psychological and physical levels. Mindful Self-Compassion (MSC) is a newly developed program particularly aimed at increasing self-compassion. The main objective of this study was to determine whether the psychophysiological stress response during a social-evaluative speaking task differs in inpatients participating in the MSC or the Progressive Muscle Relaxation (PMR) program at the end of their 6-week psychiatric rehabilitation stay (i.e., post-test only design). Method: Data from 50 inpatients (25 MSC, 25 PMR, 35 female) aged 19 to 76 years (M = 47.22, SD = 12.44) were analyzed in terms of psychophysiological stress response. For this purpose, heart rate variability, heart rate, and blood pressure were assessed together with several psychometric variables: positive and negative affect (PANAS), subjective stress perception (Visual Analog Scale), self-compassion (Self-Compassion Scale), cognitive reappraisal and suppression (Emotion Regulation Questionnaire), psychological distress (Brief Symptom Inventory-18), and appraisal and rumination (selected items). Results: After correction for alpha inflation no differences in the psychophysiological stress response and psychometric parameters between the MSC and PMR group were found. Discussion: In general, our results indicate that MSC is not superior to PMR training. However, more research with clinical randomized controlled trials investigating larger samples are needed to further affirm these initial findings. | de |
dc.language | en | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Psychologie | de |
dc.subject.ddc | Psychology | en |
dc.subject.other | heart rate variability; mindfulness; self-compassion; stress task; clinical trial; Deutsche Version der Positive and Negative Affect Schedule PANAS (GESIS Panel) (ZIS 242) | de |
dc.title | Psychophysiological stress response after a 6-week Mindful Self-Compassion training in psychiatric rehabilitation inpatients: a randomized post-test only study | de |
dc.description.review | begutachtet (peer reviewed) | de |
dc.description.review | peer reviewed | en |
dc.source.journal | Frontiers in Psychiatry | |
dc.source.volume | 14 | de |
dc.publisher.country | CHE | de |
dc.subject.classoz | psychologische Diagnostik und Beratung, psychologische Methoden | de |
dc.subject.classoz | Psychological Testing, Psychological Counseling, Psychological Methodology | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Stress | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychophysical stress | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Bluthochdruck | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | hypertension | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychologische Intervention | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychological intervention | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Wohlbefinden | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | well-being | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | klinische Psychologie | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | clinical psychology | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Emotionalität | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | emotionality | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | Problembewältigung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | coping | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychosomatische Faktoren | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychosomatic factors | en |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychophysische Belastung | de |
dc.subject.thesoz | psychophysical strain | en |
dc.identifier.urn | urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-100124-4 | |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Namensnennung 4.0 | de |
dc.rights.licence | Creative Commons - Attribution 4.0 | en |
ssoar.contributor.institution | FDB | de |
internal.status | formal und inhaltlich fertig erschlossen | de |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10036144 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10039660 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10047964 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10045580 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10049052 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10034670 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055288 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10055719 | |
internal.identifier.thesoz | 10038091 | |
dc.type.stock | article | de |
dc.type.document | Zeitschriftenartikel | de |
dc.type.document | journal article | en |
dc.source.pageinfo | 1-12 | de |
internal.identifier.classoz | 10707 | |
internal.identifier.journal | 1973 | |
internal.identifier.document | 32 | |
internal.identifier.ddc | 150 | |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098122 | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Veröffentlichungsversion | de |
dc.description.pubstatus | Published Version | en |
internal.identifier.licence | 16 | |
internal.identifier.pubstatus | 1 | |
internal.identifier.review | 1 | |
internal.pdf.valid | false | |
internal.pdf.wellformed | true | |
internal.pdf.encrypted | false | |