Hits 1-10 within 12 documents
Impact of mode design on measurement errors and estimates of individual change [journal article]
Source: Survey Research Methods, 9 (2015) 2. p.83-99
Undercoverage and nonresponse in a list-sampled telephone election survey [journal article]
Source: Survey Research Methods, 9 (2015) 2. p.71-82
Straightlining in Web survey panels over time [journal article]
Source: Survey Research Methods, 9 (2015) 2. p.125-137
Rediscovering protest: reflections on the development and consequences of the early 2012 Romanian protests [journal article]
Source: Journal of Identity and Migration Studies, 9 (2015) 2. p.62-85
Maximizing data quality using mode switching in mixed-device survey design: nonresponse bias and models of demographic behavior [journal article]
Source: Methods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 9 (2015) 2. p.163-184
Online surveys are mixed-device surveys: issues associated with the use of different (mobile) devices in web surveys [journal article]
Source: Methods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 9 (2015) 2. p.155-162
The effects of questionnaire completion using mobile devices on data quality: evidence from a probability-based general population panel [journal article]
Source: Methods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 9 (2015) 2. p.261-292
Are sliders too slick for surveys? An experiment comparing slider and radio button scales for smartphone, tablet and computer based surveys [journal article]
Source: Methods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 9 (2015) 2. p.229-260
Evaluating a modular design approach to collecting survey data using text messages [journal article]
Source: Survey Research Methods, 9 (2015) 2. p.111-123
Evaluation of an adapted design in a multi-device online panel: a DemoSCOPE case study [journal article]
Source: Methods, data, analyses : a journal for quantitative methods and survey methodology (mda), 9 (2015) 2. p.185-212