Export für Ihre Literaturverwaltung

Übernahme per Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

Asking Survey Respondents about Reasons for Their Behavior: A Split Ballot Experiment in Ethiopia


Lau, Charles Q.; McHenry, Gretchen


Bitte beziehen Sie sich beim Zitieren dieses Dokumentes immer auf folgenden Persistent Identifier (PID):http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-370786

Weitere Angaben:
Abstract When policymakers design programs and policies, they often want to understand why individuals engage in particular behaviors. Collecting survey data about respondents’ reasons for their behavior presents important challenges, and there is little methodological research on this topic. We conducted an experiment to investigate the best practices for asking questions about respondents’ reasons for their behavior. We embedded a split ballot experiment in a face-to-face survey of 608 entrepreneurs in Ethiopia. Respondents were asked questions about why they did not engage in three business practices (advertising, sharing product storage, and switching suppliers). When asked these questions, respondents were randomly assigned to one of three conditions: close-ended questions, open-ended questions with interviewer probing, and open-ended questions without probing. Respondents endorsed more responses when asked close-ended (versus open-ended) questions. Close-ended responses produced higher rates of socially undesirable responses and fewer “other” responses. Notably, probing had no effect on the number or types of responses given. Our results suggest some best practices for asking respondents questions about reasons for their behavior.
Thesaurusschlagwörter developing country; Ethiopia; survey research; survey; entrepreneur; response behavior; data collection method; motivation; analysis; interview
Klassifikation Erhebungstechniken und Analysetechniken der Sozialwissenschaften
Sprache Dokument Englisch
Publikationsjahr 2014
Seitenangabe 14 S.
Zeitschriftentitel Survey Methods: Insights from the Field (2014)
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.13094/SMIF-2014-00001
ISSN 2296-4754
Status Veröffentlichungsversion; begutachtet (peer reviewed)
Lizenz Creative Commons - Namensnennung, Nicht kommerz., Keine Bearbeitung