Export to your Reference Manger

Please Copy & Paste



Bookmark and Share

The Structure and Management of Conflict: Fighting or Defending the Status Quo

[journal article]

De Dreu, Carsten K. W.; Kluwer, Esther S.; Nauta, Aukje

fulltextDownloadDownload full text

(161 KByte)

Citation Suggestion

Please use the following Persistent Identifier (PID) to cite this document:http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-228650

Further Details
Abstract Although conflict and negotiation studies have examined symmetrical structures in which both parties want change, or asymmetrical structures in which one party wants change and the other to maintain the status quo, no research provided a direct comparison of both structures. Two experiments were conducted to fill this void. Results show that in asymmetrical structures challengers engage in more problem solving and more contending, have less of a loss frame and perceive less control than defendants, and are perceived be less successful. In symmetrical structures, behavior and attitudes of parties are more alike and there is more reciprocation of problem solving and yielding. Furthermore, findings reveal that challengers see their defendant as less friendly and more dominant than defendants see their challengers. Finally, no evidence was obtained that social value orientation moderates these effects. Implications for conflict theory and research, and for third party interventions in symmetrical versus asymmetrical conflicts, are discussed.
Free Keywords conflict; conflict management; negotiation; power; status quo;
Document language English
Publication Year 2008
Page/Pages p. 331-353
Journal Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 11 (2008) 3
DOI http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430208090646
Status Postprint; peer reviewed
Licence PEER Licence Agreement (applicable only to documents from PEER project)